Template talk:Cold War history

Why, oh why
I don't know how I missed it before, but today is the first day that I have noticed this HCW template. This template is really, really, really unnecessary. First, we already have a main Cold War template, which already covers the history of the Cold War. And those editors who are familiar with the main Cold War template know well that there has been extensive discussions about how to scope it and whether or not it is too large -- having this second HCW template really seems like a move in the wrong direction. And there is nothing in this template that isn't already covered in the Cold War infobox at the top of all relevant articles. I hope that I do not ruffle any feathers, but I am going to be bold and remove this template for the handful of articles in which it is contained. It adds nothing, and it clutters the articles with an unnecessary template. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)