Template talk:Consulting

April 2 edit
Please see diff: I removed several entries that are either private or on the smaller side. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Criteria for inclusion?
Stumbled upon this template, and it seems to have deviated greatly from its draft upon creation, which, I'm assuming, largely relied on areas of expertise and other principles. Looks like the template now has loads of different firms and individuals—not something you see very often in WP templates. Take Template:Communism for example. I am sure several more leaders, concepts, etc. could be added to the template (it already has enough imo), but most of the links include concepts, principles, and even related topics, with only a limited number of individuals who had a tremendous impact on the communist movement. It seems that this template has deviated from its original purpose and pretty much any reputable firm (subjective) can be added to the list, by virtue that they engage in consulting. Seems most appropriate to nix the firms and leave everything else. TLDR, is there a criteria for this template, or are folks just adding any multinational consulting firms to the template? Thanks. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)