Template talk:Contradiction inline

Merge with Contradict-inline
It would be great to merge this with Contradict-inline. It's particularly annoying that these are different templates since their names doesn't give any clue about the particularity of each. --Chealer (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The documentation says clearly that this template is for contradictions within the same article. Contradict-inline is for contradictions between articles (which is why it has an "article" parameter. Debresser (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * We merge redundant templates routinely. The then-current template was useless and malfunctional if not given an explicit parameter pointing to another article. By giving it sane default behavior - referring to the current article – that makes it 100% redundant with the  template, so I'm merging them.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  18:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge completed, with additional new features that help people identify the nature and location of the conflict, and ensure proper categorization (including when people use the template on non-mainspace pages, or flag conflicts between mainspace content and non-mainspace content, e.g. source discussions on the talk page). The merged template is (as of this writing) at Template:Contradict-inline, and this template now redirects there.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  20:45, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Contradict which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)