Template talk:Copyright violation

Requested move 17 March 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. However, it would be reasonable to try again with Template:Copyright violation inline. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 05:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Copyright violation → Template:Copyvio inline – Ambiguous name, proposed title matches other inline versions of amboxes such as Template:Original research inline. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 11:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Would this change the name of the template itself, or simply the name of the page? Fredlesaltique (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that the current title should be redirected to Template:Copyvio. The proposed new title currently redirects to Template:Copyvio link, which is confusing. So a lot of transclusions for this one and copyvio link would have to be renamed. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 01:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * In that case, strong oppose.
 * Every template should have a unique page whose title matches the template itself., , and are all distinct templates, and should each have their own page.
 * It seems like the confusion is coming about because the name of this template, "copyright violation", doesn't quite match how it's used. You could try wording this template page to make it clearer that it's used for inline violations. Another option is to propose that Template:Copyvio inline (there is no template ) redirect to this template page instead.
 * Hope that helps? Cheers, Fredlesaltique (talk) 02:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose shortening to "copyvio". --Gonnym (talk) 12:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Greetings!

There isn't a template, is there?

I was searching for such to tag rather a large portion of a section (in a similar fashion with ), but not the whole section.

Well, I look forward to hearing from the good people dwelling here on template dome! :-)

Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)