Template talk:Country data Northern Ireland

Incorrect flag
THis is not the Flag of Northern Ireland and should not be used as such.--Vintagekits 23:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In the context of how this template is most often used (to render icons for sports teams and athletes), it most certainly is the correct flag. Look at the FIFA website for one confirmation.  Andrwsc 00:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The use of this flag by any sporting body dosen't confer any legitimacy on it, it was the former flag of the Northern Ireland government which was disbanded in 1972 by the British government, therefore the flag has no legal standing.--padraig3uk 02:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think it has to have any legal standing to be used in this context. Andrwsc 23:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Why dont we use the tricolour then as it is also used at sporting occasions. This hasnt been the flag of Northern Ireland since the 1970's.--Vintagekits 23:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The tricolour is used to refer to the Republic of Ireland national football team. Again, see the FIFA source.  These are two different teams.  Andrwsc 00:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Andrwsc, to use the UB and claim or confer it has legal standing because its used by a sports body is wrong, the flag has political implications, in Northern Ireland it os a symbol of Unionist oppression over nationalists.--padraig3uk 23:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't even know what a "UB" is, and I'm not claiming any "legal standing" whatsoever (in fact, the reverse - I'm saying that "legal standing" is irrelevant). This flag is used by organizations such as FIFA.  I've seen it on television next to Darren Clarke's name in international golf tournaments.  When source material for sporting events use this flag to refer to Northern Ireland, then it is not unexpected that Wikipedia editors want to mirror that same notation for sports results pages.  I don't even know who Unionists or nationalists are or what they want.   Andrwsc 00:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Followup: here is another external reference that uses this flag in a current sporting context. Andrwsc 00:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This template is linked to many articles not related to football or sport, it even links to the Northern Ireland Assembly election, 2007 article, therefore the template is used for political purposes and it POV.--padraig3uk 00:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, certainly the right thing to do would be to change the articles in which "political purposes" are involved, instead of changing every article that transcludes this template to display some confusing blue blob, would it not? Andrwsc 00:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That is easier said then done, as in many cases the link is through other templates being linked to this one.--padraig3uk 01:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I found and read Northern Ireland flags issue and have a (slightly) better understanding of your concerns. I also figured out what the heck "UB" meant.  Still, it seems clear to me that the image used on this template is widely understood and reasonably accepted in the sporting context, which appears to me to be the majority of articles that transclude this template.  Therefore, I re-assert that the best course of action would be to look at individual articles and decide what to do rather than change this template to use the blue ink blot (which doesn't appear on the Flag of Northern Ireland at all).  And as for the update, it actually is easier than I suggest, not more difficult, because if you make changes to templates that use the image (such as Northern Ireland elections), you can update many articles at the same time.  Andrwsc 01:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Northern Ireland elections as you suggest contains links to a number of other templates some of which that display the flag, these are protected and can't be edited. This is the same with other templates linked in the same manner.--padraig3uk 01:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If I might help with a general clarification about page protection: Page protection is not meant to prevent changes to pages. You can request any change on any page, including templates, by adding to your request on the talk page or asking any admin directly to do the change (provided you can demonstrate consensus/no opposition for changing). Most protected templates are protected due to vandalism concerns – not to prevent regular changes. --Ligulem 12:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. If you think that the flag is inappropriate for that set of articles, just remove the  string from Northern Ireland elections.  You don't need to change anything else.  Andrwsc 01:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to raise this issue again, as it's been more than a year since it was discussed. NI has no flag. Therefore the "noflag" option is the only viable option to use for "alias" and "flag alias". This option offends nobody, since it is legally and factually accurate. The Union flag is the flag of the Union itself, not it's constituent parts. The "Ulster Banner" was terminated in 1972. Please edit this template to use the "noflag" option, which puts this issue to bed. Stevenmc (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed; I've started a sandbox page that moves the Ulster Banner to  and   variants to still allow its usage in sports contexts, while using a blank flag if no variant is used (. You'll probably need a broader consensus to change the live template, however. SiBr4  (talk ) 11:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

NI Flag issue
Getting back to this issue, alot of templates used on Northern Ireland articles use the template: NIR which links back to this template here, the flag used here is not the Northern Ireland flag, and hasn't been for the past 35yrs. In fact this flag can't even be flown from any N Ireland government building, the use of this flag is highly POV. The Main Northern Ireland article has now removed the flag from the infobox, and the debate in the talkpage there is to now use instead on infobox relating to Northern Ireland. In light of this it would be easier to make one change here instead of having to edit every infobox on the wiki, to either remove the flag completely or use the Image:NIShape.gif.--padraig3uk 07:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The Northern Ireland shape is not an official flag - nor has it been, ever, a flag to represent Northern Ireland.


 * The Flag of Northern Ireland is the correct flag of Northern Ireland and it is used to represent specifically Northern Ireland as a unique political entity, or 'sub-nation'. The government of Northern Ireland ceased to exist after it was suspended in 1972 - that is why the government of Northern Ireland doesn't use the flag of Northern Ireland: because there is no government of Northern Ireland. The flag however, still represents Northern Ireland. -- Mal 09:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Interestingly you give a link to the Flag of Northern Ireland article - this pages states that the Ulster Banner IS NOT the flag of Northern Ireland and that Northern Ireland has no flag. --Vintagekits 09:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * This is what the British Government says about the Ulster Banner:
 * Lord Greaves asked Her Majesty's Government:


 * What legislation covers the definition of the form, shape and design, and any rules about the permitted use, of (a) the union flag; (b) the English flag (cross of St George); (c) the Scottish flag(St Andrew's saltire) (d) the Scottish royal lion flag (e) the Welsh flag (dragon); (f) the flag of Northern Ireland. [HL1099]


 * 18 Jan 2007 : Column WA181


 * Lord Davies of Oldham: (a & b) There is no legislation that governs the form, shape or size of the union flag or the English flag (St George's cross). There are no rules about the permitted use of the union flag or English flag (cross of St George) on non-government buildings, provided the flag is flown on a single vertical flagstaff and neither the flag nor the flagstaff display any advertisement additional to the design of the flag as explained under the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1992. Government departments are restricted to flying flags on 18 fixed days a year in compliance with rules issued by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Consideration should also be given to flag protocol, which considers it improper to fly the union flag upside down and requires that the flag should not be defaced by text or symbols and should be treated with respect.


 * (c & d) There is also no legislation that governs the form, shape or size of the Royal Arms of Scotland (here referred to as The Scottish royal lion flag) or the St Andrew's cross, but the design is firmly specified in the Public Register of All Arms and Bearings in Scotland. The Royal Arms of Scotland can only be used by the Sovereign or Her Great Lieutenants when acting in their official capacity. The Scottish flag(St Andrew's cross) may be flown by Scots and to represent Scotland on all occasions; however, under The Act of Lyon King of Arms Act 1672, cap. 47 individuals may not deface the flag by placing a symbol on top of the flag or use it in such a way that suggests it is his/her personal property.


 * (e) There is no specific legislation about the Welsh flag design or rules about permitted use.


 * (f) The union flag is the only official flag that represents Northern Ireland. The Flags (NI) Order 2000 empowered the Secretary of State to make the Flags Regulations (NI) 2000, which governs when and where the union flag can be flown from government buildings in Northern Ireland on specified days. The legislation does not define the form, shape or design of the union flag. Flag flying from non-governmental buildings is unregulated.


 * For all flags, consideration should also be given to flag protocol, which requires flags to be treated with respect, not to be defaced by text or symbols or flown upside down. --padraig3uk 23:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That pretty much puts a nail in the coffin of Mal's argument. The Ulster Banner is in no way an official flag in Northern Ireland and the Union Flag does not solely represent Northern Ireland but rather an amalgam of England, Scotland, Wales and NI.--Vintagekits 09:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Then use the unofficial flag, as used by sports teams including the Commonwealth Games teams. Mooretwin (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Variants
I would like the other proposed flags of NI in the Variants section, being:
 * old - current flag
 * seperatist - Image:Flag_of_the_Ulster_Nation.svg
 * ulster - Image:Flag of Ulster.svg
 * patrick - Image:Saint Patrick's flag for Northern Ireland.svg
 * proposed - Image:Proposed NI Flag.png
 * utv - Image:North flagproposal1111.JPG
 * alliance - Image:Alliance Northern Ireland flag.svg
 * union - Union Jack

I think until a final flag is chosen, this should give people the possibility to chose if they don't like the old, 1973 abolished, flag. This does not want to forestall the end of the current discussion, but merely make the template workable in that people not liking the old unionist flag can now chose one of the more neutral flags to display. --85.181.35.144 19:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't regard any of them choices as neutral, and I can't see any instance in which they would be used.--padraig3uk 19:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * If in your POV none of those flags are neutral save the one abolished 1973, that's absolutely your right, but I differ. The one abolished was abolished with reason and is not seen neutral by people. I can see instances where users would use other flags than the abolished one. In the Northern Ireland flags issue article, this is discussed. If wikipedia does not want to use flags that may be seen as not neutral, it would mean to replace the existing flag in the template with the Union Jack. Regards, -85.181.57.121 21:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * As much as I dislike the Union flag, at least it is the only official flag for use in Northern Ireland, and I would rather see it used in the template then a POV flag with no official status which the British government dosen't even recognise, and which can't be flown from any government building in Northern Ireland.--padraig3uk 22:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Which is absolutely what I am saying. As long as there is no resolution of the NI Flag dispute, there should be offered variants what flag could be used. You are aware that the geographical outline you proposed in April is very close to Image:Alliance Northern Ireland flag.svg so it is almost undistinguishable?
 * I put again forward the suggestion of incorporating the above variants into the template (I added the Union Jack)so that users may chose which one to use. --85.181.57.121 16:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand what your proposing but the problem as I see it is that, some editors will continue to use the old flag to promote a certain POV, as I can't see any of the alternatives proposed except the Union Flag, as being useful in templates.--padraig3uk 19:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * This is plainly wrong. The large majority of flag template transclusions is on sports results pages.  Trust me on this — I have thousands of edits under WikiProject Flag Template and WikiProject Olympics work, so I've seen a lot.  The flag currently shown here is the one used for Northern Ireland in those contexts.  It is even endorsed by the Commonwealth Games Council for Northern Ireland (see this link).  If you have a problem with individual transclusions of this template, then address it on those pages, but it would be improper to change this template and make hundreds of other transclusions incorrect.  Andrwsc 21:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * However, I use the templates in other contexts, eg. European Parties; they are also used in biographies and other contexts. Besides, in Template:Country data Germany there are the Imperial Flags (Black-White-Red) and the Swastika Flag of the so-called "Third Empire" under variants; you will CERTAINLY NEVER see these flags in a current sports-related context. I can see that due to continuity issues, the deprecated flag can be argued to still be the "default" flag (until someone uses his bot to alter it to, say, "old" or "sports" variant). My point of allowing variants is still valid, and I see it even strengthened by Padraig's and your contributions to the discussion. --85.181.10.42 14:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * On this point, you are also wrong. Historical flags (current at the time) are frequently used for sports results from that era.  See Germany at the 1908 Summer Olympics or Germany at the 1936 Summer Olympics for examples.  Andrwsc 16:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * So you are saying the Template:Country data should only be used in sports-related articles? I deem this a waste of ressources, as the template is also handy in other contexts where nations are referenced. From my viewpoint, NIR is the only case where the official flag (Union Jack) diverges from the sports-related flag (abolished St. George's flag). If the template should only be used in sports-related contexts, this should be put into the country data sections more prominently. I also doubt the RSA (fascist Italian Socialist Republic) partook in its short existence in any sports event. --85.181.26.204 00:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Can you point out any situation were any of these variations - apart from the Union Flag and Ulster banner - could or would be used, because I fail to see any case for them.--padraig3uk 14:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * See below. I have suggested a compromise to a post from you earlier. I very well condensed my proposal down to four different flags; I myself included some flags for purposes I saw as NPOV-related and did not plan to use them as such, but I see that there is more consensus in leaving some flags out than in an all-inclusive approach. --85.181.26.204 00:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Request for edit
As the page is protected to prevent vandalism and POV edits; and as above, I explained why my proposal is neither vandalism nor POV.

So, I request now to edit the following variants into the template:
 * flag alias-old = Image:Flag of Northern Ireland.svg
 * flag alias-separatist = Image:Flag_of_the_Ulster_Nation.svg
 * flag alias-ulster = Image:Flag of Ulster.svg
 * flag alias-patrick = Image:Saint Patrick's flag for Northern Ireland.svg
 * flag alias-proposed = Image:Proposed flag of Northern Ireland.svg
 * flag alias-utv = Image:North flagproposal1111.JPG
 * flag alias-alliance = Image:Alliance ni flag.png
 * flag alias-union = Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg

Explanation:
 * union is apparently the only gouvernement-sanctioned flag as of now since 1973.
 * old is the flag used in sports events; and this variant should be used in sports-related contexts as it may cease to be the "default flag" if the discussion about the default flag turns out to be switched to the Union Jack. If the NI flag issue is solved, it can very well be changed back by a bot using the condition to only change articles under the sports cathegory.

So I ask an editor to please incorporate the obove variants into the Country Data Template. --85.181.10.42 14:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I do not think your request is appropriate. The whole point of these templates is to provide an easy-to-use, consistent, mechanism for rendering flag icon images.  The template namespace, in general, is intended for multiple-use transclusions.  These templates are not intended to be some sort of directory and/or substitute for an article like Flag of Northern Ireland.
 * Looking at your list of flags (and the pages they are transcluded on), I think a case could be made to add Template:Country data Ulster, plus Leinster, Munster, and Connacht, for the provincial flags. I have just done that.  But some of your listed images are used a total of zero or one times in main article space (and none at icon size), so it is pointless to support them in the template namespace.  Andrwsc 16:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * So you are in favour of a deprecation of the "variants"-tag in the Country data Template? To expand all "variant" sections in own "Country data"-templates like Template:Country data Weimar Republic, Template:Country data RSA Italy, Template:Country data Nazi Germany, Template:Country data Ancient Italy? I do not think this is appropriate and will find a majority.
 * I do not see where it hurts when variants not yet used are added, either: first, they can be deleted after six months if there is no usage then; second, I am very sure that at least the "union"-variant will replace the current default at least in all non-Comonwealth sports assoc articles soon. If you really did not find usage of the Union Jack as an icon and only one time in a main article, please check again. All pictures are taken from an article, so "zero" absolutely cannot be and has to be a mistake (I certainly did NOT "invent" any flags of Northern Ireland!).
 * I further do not think the usage of a Template:Country data Ulster appropriate, as Ulster right now is only a political name for Northern Ireland used by unionists.
 * --85.181.26.204 22:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm absolutely in favor of the "variants" mechanism — after all, I originally proposed and helped implement it! Check the history logs and the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Flag Template.
 * What I'm not in favor of is turning these templates into something excessively and unnecessarily complex. I repeat: there is no point in expanding this to include images that are not used in icon form to refer to Northern Ireland on any mainspace article.  WP:NOHARM is not a valid reason for something to survive a deletion discussion, nor is it a reason to make your proposed changes.  Specifically, here are my comments on the eight images you have listed:
 * Image:Flag of Northern Ireland.svg — use
 * Image:Flag of the Ulster Nation.svg — appears on 11 articles in main space; most icon instances carry a link to Scots-Irish American, which seems inappropriate to me, but I'm not sure how to fix this
 * Image:Flag of Ulster.svg — use, which I created today.  This usage seems to apply to articles that refer to the four provinces (such as All-Ireland Junior Football Championship, so why do you object to it?
 * Image:Saint Patrick's flag for Northern Ireland.svg — appears in one article in main namespace, not as an icon
 * Image:Proposed NI Flag.png — appears in zero articles in main namespace
 * Image:North flagproposal1111.JPG — appears in one article in main namespace, not as an icon
 * Image:Alliance ni flag.png — appears in one article in main namespace, not as an icon
 * Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg — use
 * Hope this helps, Andrwsc 23:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Just as a quick follow-up to myself: there is reason to create new   templates when there is a main Wikipedia article associated with it.  That's one reason why I created Template:Country data Ulster, since we have an article on Ulster.  That also explains why Template:Country data Nazi Germany exists in addition to the   variant of Template:Country data Germany.  Quite a few WWII articles like the wikilink to point to the Nazi Germany article, so we needed a distinction between   and  .  The former renders as 🇩🇪 Germany and the latter as  Nazi Germany.  See the difference? Hope this helps again!  Andrwsc 23:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I take your word that you are in favour of variants and helped create them and will not browse logs and discussions. If there is to be found any new aspects on the point you are trying to make, put it here; I am willing to edit Wikipedia, and I am willing to put forward suggestions which may unite your point ("Flags for FIFA") and Padraig's ("Only Official Flags"), but log and history browsing is not my favourite pass-time.
 * "Proposed NI Flag.png" has been replaced with "Image:Proposed flag of Northern Ireland.svg" since. If no article uses it now, it could as well be put forward for deletion. I updated my request. You see, I didn't even "invent" this flag.
 * I don't know what "WP:NOHARM" means and oppose strictly Wikipedia "abbreviationalism"; if it means "let the article live, it does not harm wikipedia", that is nice, but I do NOT see where it fits into the context of this discussion. I have proposed to put the variants on a six month trial period. Right now, many people in a non-sports and non-Commonwealth sports context seem to utilise the deprecated, inofficial flag; however, Padraig above stated that he uses a symbol equivalent to Image:Alliance ni flag.png in NI related articles.
 * "Hope this helps!" - No, it does not. " " links to United Kingdom. Here, the Union Jack as sole and only gouvernemental approved official flag of Northern Ireland shall point there. "See the difference?"


 * If you want a condensed approach, then here it is:
 * flag alias-cgf = Image:Flag of Northern Ireland.svg
 * flag alias-patrick = Image:Saint Patrick's flag for Northern Ireland.svg
 * flag alias-map = Image:Alliance ni flag.png
 * flag alias-union = Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg


 * alias-cgf: Your point is the abolished flag is still used in context with the CGF (Commonwealth Games Federation). Then it can be written as such.
 * alias-patrick: "Although nowhere near as common as the Ulster Banner, it can be regularly seen being displayed by supporters at Ulster rugby matches as a neutral unique flag to represent Northern Ireland." I have used this flag as an icon myself in one of the European Party articles when I reformatted them instead of reading logs and discussions and WP:ABBREV pages. I did this because I have objections to the POV-loading of the abolished (with the exception to CGF) NI flag. If you now found "appears in one article in main namespace, not as an icon", then somebody apparently changed it to the POV-loaded abolished (with the exception to the CGF)-flag which I did explicitly NOT use.
 * alias-map: "The Main Northern Ireland article has now removed the flag from the infobox, and the debate in the talkpage there is to now use [[Image:NIShape.gif|35px]] instead on infobox relating to Northern Ireland. In light of this it would be easier to make one change here instead of having to edit every infobox on the wiki, to either remove the flag completely or use the Image:NIShape.gif.--padraig3uk 07:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)"
 * @Padreig: compare: [[Image:NIShape.gif|35px]] and [[Image:Alliance ni flag.png|35px]]. I think while saying the same, the "flagged" NI map looks aesthetically more satisfying than the shape that never was intended as an icon. Would this be a compromise you are willing to support?
 * alias-union: Talking about official flags (and, sorry, FIFA and CGF are not official gouvernemental organisations), the Union Jack is the one and only official flag of Northern Ireland; the default flag in the template should be replaced by it (I do not propose this until someone with a bot changed all flagicon-instances in sports-related articles with the cgf-variant). The point of the flag template "NIR" and "flagcountry" and "flag" templates is to provide a link to Northern Ireland, so "flag|United Kingdom|name=Northern Ireland" is not an option here. Instead of " 🇬🇧 Northern Ireland", it is easier to write " undefined", Isn't it? This is, after all, why there are variants (or at least, making things easier is one of the things that "variants" can do).
 * I hope you find your points satisfyingly addressed now in this reduction of proposed variants. Perhaps this is now a compromise that everyone, i.e. me (Dingo), Andrew and Padraig, can live with. I am open for discussion of other objections, however.
 * "Hope that helps again!" --85.181.26.204 00:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * PS: I am used to project discussions in the form of: 1. somebody makes a suggestion; 2. the suggestion is either put to the test for a time, or objections are voiced in a matter-of-factly tone, 3. all involved parties look for a sustainable compromise. I understand that wikipedia discussions are more of the "persecutor/defendant"-style, and I surely am not on a crusade to evangelise wikipedia according to my visions. However, I would like all involved to consider whether the above style would not be advantageous to all in this special discussion; I don't think the usage of terms like "He invented it!", "Hope that helps again!" and "See the difference?" generally helps solving a problem. They surely do not concerning my person.


 * Please remain WP:CIVIL. (And if you abhor abbreviated wikilinks, you only need to click on it to see what it means.)  "Hope this helps!" was a genuine wish, but since you find it offensive, I shall refrain from writing in a friendly manner. "See the difference?" was not intended to be incivil either - the wikilinks in those two examples are different, so I thought it was necessary to point out that there was a difference.
 * Some other points:
 * The "abolished" flag is used in far more contexts than just the Commonwealth Games. I do not think it is an appropriate variant alias.
 * Image:Proposed flag of Northern Ireland.svg is also not rendered on any mainspace article in icon form.
 * These templates are not used for rendering map images.
 * flagicon is by far the most common template used in this series, so  is indeed a valid solution for individual articles that you want that to appear in.
 * Andrwsc 01:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I count 735 instances of this flag (bordered or unbordered) in the main article space, and the majority of them are sport related. 260 of those pages have "F.C." or "football" in the page name, and another 62 have "FIFA" or "UEFA" in the page name.  Snooker and darts account for another 78 pages.  About 40 pages have "Commonwealth" in the name.  My last comment in this discussion is a point I have made repeatedly: it is illogical and destructive to change the default behaviour of this template for all transclusions, especially for a minority reason.  It is more appropriate to change the appearance on specific pages to match what editors intend.  Andrwsc 01:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for stopping to use terms that can be considered offensive. I think this will help greatly to have a good discussion.
 * Although you said you did no longer want to partake in this discussion, I will still answer you:
 * The flag is not "abolished", but abolished, see Flag of Northern Ireland. There were reasons for that in the history of Northern Ireland. Padraig might elaborate this further.
 * Image:Proposed flag of Northern Ireland.svg is not part of the condensed proposal I made above. Please take a look at it. I also wrote exactly why I kept the remaining flags in the proposal; with the possibility of Image:Alliance ni flag.png being replaced by Image:NIShape.gif ([[Image:Alliance ni flag.png|35px]] or [[Image:NIShape.gif|35px]]) as this is exactly the symbol for Northern Ireland now used in wikipedia Padraig described above.
 * They are. 🇨🇾 cyprus. The reasons why a map image seems to be considered the most neutral representation of a divided country with diverging political systems(cf. Korean Unification Flag) are diverse, and Padraig also referenced reasons specifically for Northern Ireland above.
 * I never doubted  to be a valid solution. I still say   is an easier solution. Furthermore, "flagicon" may be "by far the most common template". flag and flagcountry still exist and are no deletion candidates, however, so it is still valid to use them and to want to use them. Apart from that, as an informatician, I consider the usage of a template for one country for another country dirty. If I mean United Kingdom, I shall use a template for the UK; if I mean Northern Ireland, a UK template is not appropriate. This is however Hypertext puritanism, and I would swallow it if it were the only reason.
 * To your last point: I explicitly said I do not want to alter the default behaviour, at least not until a bot changed all sports-related usages of the "flag"-templates to the appropriate variant. The numbers surely are impressive, but there still are articles outside sports that use or begin to use flag icons, most notably biographies and international organisations. That's why I do not want to alter the default behaviour, but I want variants added. And I really do not see your problem with that. Save for vandals editing the variants into sports-related articles - where the abolished flag is still the correct flag, at least when the CGF is concerned, variants do not alter the status quo in any form. (And you already showed how even without the variants the sports-related articles can be changed.)
 * I really think I have described why I want which modifications in this template. If something remains unclear, please write me. --85.181.26.204 04:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * variant has been added. Use  to render  Northern Ireland.  This should be sufficient for all icon transclusions (outside the sporting world) that have been described.  None of the other images previously mentioned are currently rendered in icon form in main article space, so there is no need for those to be added as variants.  Andrwsc 20:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Andrwsc, thanks for adding that, is it possible to shorten that to NIR or add that to the NIR template as an variant as  .--padraig3uk 15:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmm, not exactly as you propose. The "NIR" country code can be used with flagcountry like this:   →  undefined.  The   template will work with the country code, but it will use "NIR" as the display string, like this:   →  NIR.
 * As for the "shortcut" templates like NIR, they are all hardcoded to do a specific thing, and do not accept any template parameters. As a collective set, they lack the ability to specify flag variants, alternate display names, and even different icon sizes.  Some editors advocate their usage for brevity and simplicity (see Inline templates linking country articles for a full directory), but to be honest, I'd rather deprecate the lot and use the   template exclusively.  I've seen multiple instances where editors felt it necessary to add comments to wiki markup to help explain obscure codes used for these templates.  My response is why bother writing   when   is simpler!
 * But I digress — I think the short answer is that I think NIR is stuck the way it is, unless we 1) make it different from all the other templates in this series, or 2) make significant changes to the whole lot. Andrwsc 16:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, the problem is most of the disputed templates use the NIR template - which we can't alter as its used on too many sports articles and templates - and when I or other editors try to edit these disputed templates to remove the flag or to use the Union Flag, we get reverted, it was even brought to mediation in one case here.--padraig3uk 17:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I think your best bet is to successfully argue for the removal of flag images altogether in instances like that, rather than changing the Northern Ireland flag and leaving the others alone. Despite my large amount of work on flag templates and my strong advocacy for their adoption in certain instances (e.g. Olympic and other sports results articles, military articles, etc.) I think there are far too many instances on Wikipedia where flags are used for decoration only.  The Marilyn template seems to be an example of that.  It would be nice to progress the Don't overuse flags essay towards some specific policy guidelines...  Andrwsc 18:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Northern Irish alias
Topic: I created aliases "Northern Irish" and "Irish (Northern)".


 * The question below is copied from my talk page for better discussion here

I see you created a northern Irish template, can I ask you why, their is no such nationality, anyone from Northern Ireland is either Irish or British or both.--padraig 13:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

&mdash;

Hello. In a nutshell, it's not a template but a redirect that's needed to generate an alias parameter for use in Flag with data from Template:Country data Northern Ireland.

In details: I created a redirect to the existing countrydata template for Northern Ireland. (Actually two redirects, "Northern Irish" and "Irish (Northern)" to allow some choice). Creating such a redirect is needed in order to create/enable an alias in the parameters of the Flag templates. For instance we have the basic:


 *  UK outputs UK

But thanks to the alias/redirect at Template:Country data British we also have:


 *  British outputs

So, on this model, I created/enabled an alias for "Irish", which can only redirect to the flag template for Republic of Ireland:


 * 🇮🇪 Ireland outputs 🇮🇪 Ireland
 *  Irish outputs

However, the badly-named countrydata project is actually a flagdata project for all manner of *flags*, including "countrydata" templates such as:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England outputs 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Wales outputs 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Wales
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Scotland outputs 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Scotland
 * <NOWIKI> Northern Ireland</NOWIKI> outputs Northern Ireland

So for them I similarly created aliases "English", "Welsh", "Scottish", plus "Northern Irish" and "Irish (Northern)".

Now the tricky part, and one reason I was working on this, is that people just keep on deleting "British" in infoboxes and such, and replace it with "English" or "Welsh" and such -- even though you're right they're not nationalities in the way the rest of the world understand this word. Having to constantly revert/edit "nationality" fields from "English" to "British" is a waste of time, so I'm thinking of trying to deter the problem with a dual thing such as:


 * Nationality: British ( English)
 * Nationality: British ( Welsh)
 * Nationality: British ( Scottish)
 * Nationality: British ( Northern Irish)
 * Nationality: British ( Irish (Northern))

Hence the clumsy aliases/redirects for the Northern Ireland flag: we can't use "Irish" and the Republic of Ireland flag for the case of British citizens from Northern Ireland. You can also see the essay at WP:FLAGCRUFT on that hot topic.

&mdash; Komusou talk @ 14:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Well the Ulster Banner is not a recognised flag for Northern Ireland as it is a former Banner of the Government of Northern Ireland between 1953-1972, this flag cease to officially exist when that government was abolished under the Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973, today the only official flag for Northern Ireland is the Union Flag so this should used instead for these, also under the Belfast Agreement Irish people born in Northern Ireland are not automatically British, the are entitled to regard themselves as either Irish, British or have duel Irish/British nationality. Your creation of these templates will only result in on-ending edit wars, as for example if someone tries to use these on Gerry Adams.--padraig 14:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Note that these interpretations are disputed Astrotrain 14:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * padraig: For controversial biographies, I suppose people will only agree to let it at
 * Nationality:
 * or
 * Nationality:
 * without any more details. Actually I was firstly concerned with the much common problem of biographies endlessly switching between "British" and "English", so I created the "English" alias modeled on the "British" alias, for dual use as explained earlier above. That is, if we document " British (English) " we should have much less people endlessly trying to switch between the two, at least that's what I believe and would like to try out.
 * Then, once started, I did the same for all the others -- of course, it becomes problematic once you hit the Ireland templates. The way I see it:
 * It's offering a choice for biographies were people can agree on a dual thing, and it won't be used anyway on controversial biographies, not any more than a text label.
 * It doesn't make things worse, because people warring about that are already doing it in text, or using piped versions of the flag templates. Note that the aliases I created are just a shortcut, anybody can type <NOWIKI> UK or 🇮🇪 Ireland</NOWIKI> and he'll get " UK " or " 🇮🇪 Ireland ".
 * I mean, I don't think that my adding aliases creates the problem, the problem already exists without the aliases. The aliases are just useful for good faith edits -- bad faith edits will always use the  param without needing any alias. &mdash; Komusou talk @ 15:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * In addition to the issues described specifically for Northern Ireland, I think I should comment on the overall plan. Template:Country data British was specifically created for use with Template:Infobox Ambassador so that it would display "British Ambassador to..." instead of "United Kingdom Ambassador to...".  See David Manning for the lone instance in which this is implemented.  I don't think the idea of adding redirect aliases for nationalities is a good idea, especially since the sentiment at Don't overuse flags is to remove that type of flag icon usage.  Please reconsider whether you really want to work on these "Nationality" infoboxes if it will be removed (by policy) later.  Thanks, Andrwsc 15:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Komusou, you seem to be missing the point with 🇮🇪 Ireland the people I refered such as Gerry Adams are not British.--padraig 20:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Padraig, you would use the nationality with which that person has selected. So, for people that chose Irish only, it would be  Irish, those that chose British only would be  British , and those that chose both would be  British    Irish or  Irish    British . --Bobblehead (rants) 20:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * That is where you will get edit wars, as some editors think everyone in Northern Ireland is British and refuse to accept this is not the case, same with the use of a defunct flag the Ulster banner this shouldn't be used for people from Northern Ireland as its not a flag recognised by either the British Government or the Northern Ireland Executive.--padraig 20:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, the new-improved version of my solution is to use "One citizenship, one flag". Meaning that only the UK gets a flag and not the parenthetical English/Northern Irish/etc. trailing part. Meaning that the new aliases wouldn't be needed after all, at least not for my plan. Also, an additional possible change would be to update the infoboxes from displaying "Nationality: British" to "National of: United Kingdom" or "Citizen of: United Kingdom", so that we use the name of the country instead of its demonym. In both cases, the aliases aren't needed any more, and there's no flag for Northern Ireland to be displayed anyway. Meaning that you have my blessing if you want to have the new alias deleted. (Details at FLAGCRUFT-Talk with proposal version "d2" in the table.) &mdash; Komusou talk @ 10:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I am going to take your blessing to speedy delete those extra aliases and revert the documentation changes to the main templates. Thanks!  Andrwsc 16:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Andrwsc: I must have been unclear, I'm not working on creating any "Nationality infoboxes", I'm talking about how to fill the current  field of various infoboxes, especially the biographical infoboxes. I have summarized an illustrated case study about the P. G. Wodehouse article, you can see it at the talk page for the FLAGCRUFT essay &mdash; Komusou talk @ 21:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Just to insert myself here as well, the intent of the nationality field is to reflect a person's citizenship not their sub-categorization within that citizenship. So for those born anywhere in the UK and where the designation of such is not divisive, British is the only designation that should be used. --Bobblehead (rants) 21:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No, I understand perfectly. My comment is that I think the nationality= usage in biographical infoboxes is a flawed idea, and WP:FLAG doesn't quite advise against not using flags there, but certainly recommends not using flags for birth and death locations.  It also states that nationality= is not always non-controversial, so editors should beware.  Based on this, my concern is that you're making it more "acceptable" for editors to start using these aliases freely.  I'm also concerned that you've only addressed Britain and Ireland.  Are you planning to create hundreds of more aliases for every other country? (e.g. "Swiss", "Dutch", "French", "Djiboutian", "Paraguayan", ...)  Lord, I hope not.  And I would discourage anybody else from thinking this would be a good thing to do!  Andrwsc 21:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You're right that it would lead, eventually, to the creation of a demonym alias for almost each countrydata template. But as told above and at FLAGCRUFT, a better solution would be a guideline to replace "Nationality: British" to "National of: United Kingdom" or "Citizen of: United Kingdom" so that neither an alias nor a  is needed. It would even be more useful for many readers, who may know a country name (Netherlands) better than its demonym (Dutch). (Details at FLAGCRUFT-Talk...) &mdash; Komusou talk @ 10:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'm glad you agree! I've seen some articles with demonyms in the article title, and they are often confusing to say the least.  Not every nationality has a widely recognized name.  I remember a discussion about national team articles (i.e. should it be Germany national football team or German national football team?) and once people saw the implications of adopting the latter naming system for all teams — such as Sammarinese national football team for San Marino — that idea was dropped in a hurry.  Andrwsc 16:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * padraig: I must have been unclear (bis :-)), the "Flag|Ireland|name=British" thing was a joke intended to show that the aliases I created aren't needed at all for those who'd want to abuse the flag system, they can just already combine any flag and any nationality with the  param, so my creating the aliases is harmless in itself with that respect. As for Gerry Adams, I guess that if the   field of his infobox was enabled, he would still benefit from the shortcut <NOWIKI> Irish</NOWIKI> instead of having to type <NOWIKI>🇮🇪 Ireland</NOWIKI> in order to get  Irish . If the editors of Gerry Adams prefer to disable this field on such a hot article that's understandable, but for most articles there is no such restriction and the aliases would be handy; as for the specific alias for "Northern Irish", it'll be like it is today: on articles where editors got a consensus for displaying a text such as "Nationality: British (Northern Irish)" then they'll have the possibility of chosing by consensus one variant among such, including using the generic alias:
 * Nationality: British
 * Nationality: British (Irish)
 * Nationality: British (Northern Irish)
 * Nationality: British
 * Nationality: British (Irish)
 * Nationality: British (Northern Irish)
 * Nationality: British (  Northern Irish )
 * And on articles where too much warring has led to disabling the  field, then they won't have any flag to add anyway. As I see it, the aliases don't create additional trouble, because the root problem is about which text labels to use or not.
 * It's all a bit abstract, isn't it? Let's take a real case about someone I know about:
 * * Our current article about Garth Ennis has a bio infobox that says "Nationality: Northern Irish". This is wrong because it should say "British", the Wikipedia rules about that are clear.
 * * Yeah, but if we put "British" there, this article will be switched back and forth between the two names every other week or month, which is a problem and a waste of time; we should try to be proactive and do better than.
 * * Against that problem, I propose to try and write there "Nationality: British (Northern Irish)", which is the main point I want to push -- I find the little flags useful there, but I could live without if a project-wide consensus decided on a policy to ban them.
 * * Now my second point is, in a relatively uncontroversial article where editors agreed to write "British (Northern Irish)", about adding the flag templates, which are currently accepted usage in tables and infoboxes. In order to add flags to Garth Ennis, we would normally code:
 * <NOWIKI>UK ( Northern Ireland)</NOWIKI>
 * Nationality: UK ( Northern Ireland)
 * I have merely made aliases allowing to reduce the above to shortcuts:
 * <NOWIKI>British ( Northern Irish)</NOWIKI>
 * Nationality: British ( Northern Irish)
 * * That's just more convenient. That's what I said above, my new alias isn't allowing something that would have been impossible before, it's just a shortcut for doing something that always was possible. If there's no consensus on an article for doing it, the alias won't make it any easier than it is today using the  param. If there are edit wars, they'll be about the text labels to put anyway, even if flags were banned. The flags are just on top of whatever "Nationality" has been decided by the editors, and the "Northern Irish" alias is just completing the series for that.
 * &mdash; Komusou talk @ 21:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * (EC)Well, if it's too divisive, it is always an option to not not use the nationality field in the infobox and leave it for the article to explain their nationality. But then, I don't see the point of using, , , or as they aren't official designations of citizenship. Of course, that could be a function of me being from the US. --Bobblehead (rants) 21:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Answered and explained at FLAGCRUFT-Talk... &mdash; Komusou talk @ 10:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Proposed change
I would like to change the  of this template. In most browsers, when you mouse-over the image, you will see "Flag of Northern Ireland", and I think it is preferable to see "Ulster Banner" instead. I'm also expecting that someday the image file itself will be changed (e.g. to Image:Ulster Banner.svg on Commons), but that is a different issue. If I change the alt attribute now, it would also read "Ulster Banner" with the  and   flag variants, which is clearly incorrect. Therefore, I would like to propose the removal of those two flag variants. After the big debate a few months ago that led to their inclusion, I note that the  variant appears to be completely unused, and the   variant is only used in two places (one template, one article). Comments requested before I do anything. Andrwsc (talk) 21:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * There is no real evidence of the name Ulster Banner being used outwith Wikipedia- Red Hand Flag is more common for example. Perhaps Unofficial Flag of Northern Ireland would be better (per Britannica and World Flag Databse)? Astrotrain (talk) 22:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Assembly flag as option?


How about the Assembly fag to be added to the template as an option? It could be used when the term Northern Ireland is used in lists that require a flag (eg List of national anthems).

It strikes me that since the choice of passports, the Union Jack fits best as a full-on "national" flag (and I've always seen Northern Ireland is a created British country, though it's more complex than that I know). I am just about to try using the 'union' parameter, since someone has removed the current NI flag from the national anthem list (ie. the automatic 'Ulster banner' on the template - which sounds like an unhappy compromise, reading the above). It will show the Union Jack, but I don't hold a lot of hope in it sticking.

If the Assembly flag would stop people from removing the flag in these type of lists, why not have the option to use it? It is clearly designed to be a striking symbol - perhaps with this use in mind? I don't think the Welsh Assembly even has a flag (there is some kind of 'caligraphy' version of the dragon they use as a symbol). The Scottish Parliament flag is very officious-looking and has it's full title on it. Perhaps using the Assembly flag could cover dual citizenship better too? At the moment the List of national anthems corrupts when someone clicks on the up/down column arrow, as the lack of NI flag (though it's the only flag that is missing) confuses it - not an ideal situation (to state the obvious, I know).--Matt Lewis (talk) 00:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I find it a bit of an anomaly that N.Ireland has no flag to represent it on wiki. This is why I support Matt's proposal to use the Assembly flag. It was also used to represent Northern Ireland on the one pound coin which was minted in 1986 and the eary 90's as shown in the article One pound (British decimal coin). It does represent the whole of N.Ireland, thus the reason for my support for Matts proposal. I hope others will give their views on this idea. Thanks. Titch Tucker (talk) 16:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

List of countries by intentional homicide rate
editprotected

Please see:
 * Talk:List of countries by intentional homicide rate

To solve the alphabetical sorting problem we must use some variation of


 * undefined


 * undefined

To avoid edit warring I would like a variant that uses a blank placeholder image. A transparent gif or something. So no flag would be seen. Then sorting would work, and no one would be offended.

I used   in this talk section because I think we need some expert admin help. I don't know how to find or create the suggested variant. --Timeshifter (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Confused... we need a technical workaround because people can't decide to get along about which flag to use for a "country within a country" / "region appropriated by the UK" ? Seems rather a slippery slope to me. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 01:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * According to the article talk page: "Northern Ireland does not have a flag, it has not had one since 1973."


 * Is there anyway to use a transparent gif with this template: flagcountry --Timeshifter (talk) 05:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll add a variant "blank".
 * undefined


 * undefined

—Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 21:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --Timeshifter (talk) 23:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I have reverted this change. Use noflag for precisely this purpose. It is tremendously misleading to render an image where a flag is expected, so better to render nothing at all. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 21:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I agree. I did not know of noflag. It is better than a blank spot with a border that looks like it is missing a flag. --Timeshifter (talk) 21:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

NI Flag template descriptions
The excuse that some sports bodies use it, and I emphasize some, is not a tangable argument for keeping it as the main linked country flag. The Union flag is the only official flag. It is a nonsense to use a flag, defunct for some 35 years, as the primary flag. Mr Parker (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * At the moment the undefined template reproduces the Ulster Banner. This is not the Flag of Northern Ireland and it is misleading to describe it as such.  I propose that use of this flag is caveated to inform users as to when it was an official flag - much like historic flags for other countries e.g. Canada. A solution may may to describe it as  undefined or  undefined or :  undefined . Suggestions? thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vintagekits (talk • contribs)
 * Is this issue going to reach any resolution as it stands an historic flag is being used as the flag of NI against policies of WP:V and WP:RS which can be found to show that this is not the flag. BigDunc  Talk 18:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The current &  Northern Ireland should show a blank rectangle in place of the flag.
 * For articles about Northern Ireland 1953–1972 it should be &  Northern Ireland which would appear as  &  Northern Ireland.
 * Both of these suggestions have been repeated above but it still hasn't been fixed. ~Asarlaí 18:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Who has the knowhow?--Vintagekits (talk) 20:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * As outlined above I consider the "Canada" solution an appropriate way to work this. --Vintagekits (talk) 11:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that specifying a "1953" variant might be appropriate for some transclusions of this template, but likely the minority of transclusions. For example, contemporary references to the football team (e.g. using  etc.), to Commonwealth Games teams, to golfers from Northern Ireland, to the netball team, etc. all use that flag in the present day, and there is consensus for this usage.  It would be awkward and inappropriate to burden those instances with having to specify a flag variant label in the template call.  Also, there is no way for the flag template system to render no image; the closest is to render a white space or something, but that is misleading because it looks like a white flag.  I still maintain that the best course of action is to patrol the pages that link to this template and replace the inappropriate instances with  (or outright removal), than it would be to edit ~2500 pages to install a variant label. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 15:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Request for consensus - flag
I would like to request for opinion and up to date consensus with regards to the flag used in undefined. The current flag is the Ulster Banner ( undefined). It's use is inappropriate to represent Northern Ireland since the Ulster Banner is no longer the official flag of Northern Ireland and for this reason I feel it should be replaced (but not by the absence of any flag or symbol). It was suggested previously that is used. Opinions please. Qwerta369 (talk) 12:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Looking at the discussions above, this issue has been raised before. To amend this template would involve having to amend approximately 2,500 articles where the use of the flag is appropriate, such as certain sporting articles where its use is correct and pre-1973 uses of the flag and so on. It seems an awful lot of work for someone when it is generally simpler to weed out the incorrect uses of the flag. I have no real opinion either way, other than the lack of change of this template does not make the use of the flag valid in inappropriate articles. O Fenian (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Inventing a flag is against policy: WP:OI Gnevin (talk) 11:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This issue needs to be resolved ASAP and can't be dragged on and on. The fact remains that Northern Ireland does not have a flag of its own that is official. The permanent removal of the old defunct Ulster banner needs to happen rather than talking about it. Eireabu (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There is strong consensus—backed by WP:Reliable sources—to use this flag on Wikipedia pages where it is appropriate (mostly sport-related pages) and remove the flag icon from pages where it isn't appropriate. Either way, there is no reason to change this template. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * What Andrwsc said. I do however think there may be value in making  an option, or perhaps explaining how to use noflag in the documentation. While most of the uses I've seen are appropriate, I'm sure there are a lot of inappropriate ones around. —WFC— 18:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * noflag is definitely the correct option for those instances where a flag is undesirable, since it will not render any placeholder PNG file, but instead simply indent the succeeding text. I have just created Template:Country data Northern Ireland/doc, which is automatically transcluded. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 20:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Just for the record Northern Ireland has NEVER had an official flag. The Ulster Banner was the flag of the defunct government NOT of the province/region/country* (*delete where appropriate). Let's get shot of it. I have sometimes used which uses cc3|NIR to replace the flag with NIR. The fact that there are 2,500 articles that NEED changing is neither here nor there. At the very least we should be enforcing the Irish Manual of Style on this (which is currently not happening) unlike Derry/Londonderry. Bjmullan (talk) 22:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Other provinces
With Ulster being included in related links, should not the other three provinces (Leinster, Munster, and Connacht) be included? --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The other three provinces are not connected to Northern Ireland.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  17:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Add more flag options
Shouden't we add more flag options? According to the Flag of Northern Ireland article the "St Patrick's Saltire is used the by government to represent Northern Ireland when a uniquely Northern Irish flag is required". Maybe also the Flag of Ulster. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 08:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Making an official request to add the saltire.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 04:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: This is a little bit too vague for me to know what you want to be done. Could you add the proposed changes to the sandbox first? Once you've done that, reactivate the template and I'll copy the text over. Best — <span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 16:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 6 June 2017
Requesting that the flag of the Northern Ireland Assembly and the St Patrick's Saltire, which is sometimes used to represent Northern Ireland in politics, be added to the list of variations. The proposed changes can be seen in full here. This will give people valid alternatives to use, other than no flag, when the Ulster Banner and Union Flag are not suitable to represent Northern Ireland. Clyde1998 (talk) 14:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – Train2104 (t • c) 20:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

23 pixel Ulster Banner is now null?
I would like to edit this page, because today I noticed that the flag on the template is missing. (Replaced with a null image.) And I can't fix that due to the protection pages. Can I please fix the issue? Thanks, &#35;bodyContent a&#91;title&#61;&#34;User:Aaxelpediaa&#34;&#93; &#123; background-color: #0000ff&#59; color: #ff0000&#59; font-weight: bold&#59; (talk) 09:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I've requested that the file be moved back as there was no prior discussion and the requestor has a username indicating a probable bias in this topic area.
 * , You don't currently meet the requirements to edit protected templates. Keep up the requests & you'll get there. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Cabayi (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit request: Update Assembly Flag to SVG version
"assembly" currently points to the PNG file. An SVG version is now available and this template should be updated accordingly:. Thank you. Carter (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 9 May 2021
The proposed changes can be seen in full at Template:Country data Northern Ireland/sandbox.

The proposal includes Carter's request of using an SVG file for the Assembly's flag instead of the current PNG.

Furthermore, the proposal uses the blank File:Flag placeholder.svg as the default flag, with the Ulster Banner remaining a variant that can be used in certain contexts. This is appropriate because the Ulster Banner is not the Flag of Northern Ireland. We had a similar situation with Mississippi, which did not have a flag for a while, and we used the placeholder flag back then. It is not appropriate to use the Ulster Banner as the default flag, like the template currently does, because it is not the flag of Northern Ireland. --Fippe (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Question, how would this affect all the current uses of the flag? The vast majority of the 10,000+ are used in a sporting context, and if the change involves a lot articles it might be simpler just to manually police usage, as happens at present. FDW777 (talk) 12:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * A quite convenient situation for Ulster Banner supporters. --Fippe (talk) 12:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Which I am clearly not. FDW777 (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , the .png has been converted to .svg. In the article Flag of Northern Ireland, the fact that the Ulster flag is no longer official is supported, but it goes on to say that the flag is still used "as the flag of Northern Ireland by loyalists and unionists, and to represent Northern Ireland internationally in some sporting competitions. So it appears that consensus is needed to remove it.  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 15:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not necessarily against the change, as it would hopefully result in less policing of incorrect uses. It's the potential problems the change may cause I'd like clarified. There are currently 11,060 uses of the flag, the majority of which are accurate (and many of which use this template to display. For example Bristol City F.C. (the first article on the list] uses twice and  once. Since that's a football article, those are correct uses. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but the proposed change will simply amend every use like that to a blank flag instead? FDW777 (talk) 16:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think you're correct. It would change all usages including the sports articles. The only other alternative would be to use the official flag, the Union Jack, instead of the Ulster flag. Using the placeholder flag seems to me to be ill-advised. There might be an uprising of both Ulster-pro and Ulster-con editors!  P.I. Ellsworth    ed.  put'r there 16:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Well, you've a problem there, then, because there is no official flag for NI, and using the Union Jack as a default replacement would be completely inappropriate. It is likewise inappropriate to use the flag of an institution (e.g., the NI Assembly) for anything other than the NI Assembly. It's quite possible any uses in a sporting context are also incorrect - if representing a national team, it is usually more appropriate to use the flag (if any) of the sporting body representing that sport.  So I would support either a) leaving things as they are at present; or b) using the blank placeholder with no optional parameters. <span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 18:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The status quo means the Ulster Banner, I fail to see how that is appropriate. --Fippe (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The status quo means the Ulster Banner in appropriate contexts, it's specifically mentioned at Template:Country data Northern Ireland, WP:IRISH FLAGS and Manual of Style/Icons not to use it in certain circumstances. You're acting as though it's used inappropriately in hundreds of articles, it isn't. There probably are a few incorrect instances in the list provided that need changing, but I can assure you they are a small percentage of the total as I try and keep an eye on things. What's been suggested will cause problems on many, many, football articles (which make up the majority of the uses) and nobody has yet said they are going to step up and fix the problems this change will create. FDW777 (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Not everyone who uses undefined has read several manuals of style. It is not weird to assume that  undefined yields the appropriate flag, and not an unofficial flag which may be used for some football events but is very inappropriate to use in most other contexts. It is not exactly future-proof to rely on a single user who promises to "keep an eye on things" in case someone uses the template intuitively again. --Fippe (talk) 20:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * You've still failed to explain who is going to fix the huge mess this change will cause. I assume by your failure to answer that you have no intention of doing it? FDW777 (talk) 20:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

For the Luddites amongst us (me), please can you explain the proposed change? GiantSnowman 21:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The proposal is to change the template so that if anyone uses flag or flagicon (and potentially some more, I'm not sure how wide the effect would be) it would, by default, display a blank flag. So for example at Bristol City F.C. the flag next to Tommy Doherty at Bristol City F.C. would become blank, similarly at Bristol City F.C. the flag next to Peter Doherty would become blank. Many other sporting articles currently use those and, at the moment, there is no information as to who will be fixing the mess it will cause. FDW777 (talk) 21:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Got you - in which case I oppose any suggested changes. As you rightly point out sportspeople use the Ulster flag and that should be displayed where appropriate, rather than a blank flag.


 * My support for changing this template would be conditional on not having the default flag be blank. From an eyeball, it looks like the vast majority of these are sports articles, for which the Ulster flag would be the default. I would oppose any change which would make a blank flag display when the Ulster is the default for most flag use cases. Now, the flag use on Dwight D. Eisenhower is a separate thing... SportingFlyer  T · C  21:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Appears to be used twice in Ike's article, once as flagicon and once as flagu. I see where some would question it.  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 05:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * In principle, I support this change, as there is no official flag of Northern Ireland. However, most of the current uses of the NI flag are correct, as they are for sports team, so this change shouldn't be made until there is an agreement on the cleanup task for this, namely that all correct uses of NI flag for sports teams must not be lost. My suggestion would be a bot or AWB script that changes uses of NIR to  NIR, this could be limited in some way if needed, so that it only applies to sports (where NI flag is the flag used). And same procedure could be used for other flag templates (flagicon, flagcountry etc). It is inappropriate to make this change until the cleanup has been agreed, as it would be damaging to thousands of articles. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * My concern with this is someone adding a blank NIR template to a new sports page would be confused due to the lack of a flag, since the flag situation isn't obvious. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * that sounds like it has potential, since the cleanup aspect is the most difficult. I will add that there are other templates such as flagu and flagicon (and potentially others, I'd prefer it if someone technical could make sure there is a full list of flag template variants affected) as well as flag. You'd also need to do "|Northern Ireland|banner" as a variant text, as that's used as well as NIR. FDW777 (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Related discussion
Talk:Comparison of alphabetic country codes. FDW777 (talk) 13:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Blank Flag
There should be a null or blank flag, since NI has no official flag. The Ulster Banner (current one used) is highly political and not offocial.Eccekevin (talk) 01:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The Ulster Banner is still used to represent the Northern Ireland football team, Commonwealth Games team and individual athletes form Northern Ireland. The consensus on Wikipedia is to only use this flag in sporting and historical contexts therefore the image is still appropriate. There are plans to adopt a new "civic flag" to represent Northern Ireland which could be added to the Northern Ireland country data if and when a design is agreed. Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 07:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Neutral Flag/Consensus on Template
This has been much discussed but no consensus has ever been reached. As Northern Ireland has no official flag to represent Northern Ireland specifically, at least not yet, it would seem sensible to me for the "Northern Ireland" flag template to direct to a blank template.

The Ulster Banner (which is currently linked when the Northern Ireland flag template is used) has been agreed to be used only pertaining to sports organisations that use it and in a historical context. As such it should be a variant ("banner", perhaps), but linking it as the flag for Northern Ireland is currently not suitable in my opinion. Bbx118 (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I think the main usage of usage of this template would be for sporting events, where Northern Ireland uses the Ulster Banner. Having a blank flag as the default was cause problems with Template:Flagicon (and related offshoots), which gets regularly used in sporting articles (especially related to the nationality of sports people). The only official flag in Northern Ireland is the Union Flag, however that would cause ambiguity between whether it's supposed to represent Northern Ireland, the United Kingdom (or Great Britain) or certain British Overseas Territories when using Template:Flagicon. I think with this template's most predominant usage, the Ulster Banner is the most suitable flag to use to represent Northern Ireland, with the caveat it should only be used in sporting or historical contexts. Clyde1998 (talk) 15:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)