Template talk:Cricketarchive

URL format
Quick question, easily answered by someone who has access. Would links with a URL format of "/Archive/Articles/" resolve to "/Archive/Players/" now? I suspect it's an old format, but as I don't have access I can't check. I was going to convert a link I came across to the template, on the Trevor Every article. The current link points to http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Articles/0/742.html but if I use that ID on the template, it resolves to http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/0/742/742.html - do they go to the same page?

This opens up a wider question also, because I have come across other links that do not use the template, and therefore do not make it clear that a subscription is required. I was thinking of submitting a bot request to convert any links, but just wanted clarification on this beforehand (unless, of course, this is in hand already?) Nzd   (talk)  12:48, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 14 December 2017
Change the instances of CricketArchive to CricketArchive. The article was deleted. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:29, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- John of Reading (talk) 08:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 31 March 2021
Put a wikilink at CricketArchive. The article CricketArchive was created again and has been stable for some time now. extra 999 ( talk ) 22:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, and thank you very much!  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 19:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)