Template talk:D&D creatures

What goes on this template
I'm thinking that what should go on this template are all pages that list D&D creatures. Each creature by itself doesn't fit. Dragons have list pages, do other creatures? - Peregrine Fisher 21:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * If the creature articles don't all fit in one template, there are probably too many of them and some mergers are needed. We've got all the dragons on one row, and I anticipate eventually doing that with each of the 14 other types. Neon  Merlin  04:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

There's no need to expand out all of dragons and all of elementals. There's only a few articles of each, and the dragon(d&d) and elemental(d&d) articles should point to the specialised types anyway --unsigned comment by me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.208.114.181 (talk) 18:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

use of
Do you know that is only used for adding more groups? Should you wish to have subgroups, is what's needed. Chris DHDR 15:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * and now redirect to Navbox subgroup. — QuicksilverT @ 01:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)