Template talk:Db-notice

Edit request 17 April 2024
Description of suggested change: Hi, so I'm like to change something to Template:Db-notice-multiple. Can you do that for me? Diff: 71.208.39.196 (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC) PAGE ]]) 15:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @MSGJ I'm not necessarily endorsing this change, but the diff provided by 71.208.39.196 should suffice for a "change X to Y". --Ahecht ([[User talk:Ahecht|TALK
 * That's not a diff? I still don't know what they are asking &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This is probably the diff. No edit summary though. Needs an explanation to understand what is going on, I think. – Novem Linguae (talk) 17:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 28 April 2024
Description of suggested change: On Template:Di-dw no source no license-notice and Template:Di-dw no source-notice can you change deprecated "Image" to "File" like how the original no source and no source no license notices says "File" instead of "Image"? Thanks. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done:  is not deprecated, it is a documented alias for   and works equally well; there are no plans to change that. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 17:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * All I found was "For backward compatibility with older pages the alias Image: (now deprecated) is still available instead of File: in wikilinks or in the search box, but "image" will now refer to more types of data files than just images." TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 18:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It is deprecated as a prefix at the top of files, but is still avaliable as a link (e.g. Image:Example.svg) TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 18:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Deprecated doesn't mean "you must replace all existing uses of this", it means "you should not use this when writing new code". WP:AINTBROKE applies. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Huh? I asked can you change it because Template:Di-no source-notice, Template:Di-no license-notice, and Template:Di-no source no license-notice as "File" instead of "Image". I thought that it would look the same is another reason why. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to change it, because it will make absolutely no difference - in short, it's a change for the sake of change. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, okay then. I did not ask again about you changing it, I only asked once, so I don’t know what do you mean by "I'm not going to change it". Most admins here think I waste their time anyway. I’m done.TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you genuinely don't understand the simple six-word phrase "I'm not going to change it", I'm certainly not going to waste any more time explaining it. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

"Template:Empty-warn" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Empty-warn&redirect=no Template:Empty-warn] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 13:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

"Template:Db-empty-notice" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Db-empty-notice&redirect=no Template:Db-empty-notice] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2024 (UTC)