Template talk:Did you know/Ayudhapurusha

Ayudhapurusha

 * ... that weapons (mace pictured) are sometimes personified in Hindu art?
 * Reviewed: A2 (Croatia)

5x expanded by Redtigerxyz (talk). Self nom at 16:22, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook
 * Length, format, content rules:
 * Source:
 * Interest: Original not interesting. Perhaps use the 50 sons and magical weapons? Oh, I see Panyd's suggestion, which is better than the original. Tony   (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Image suitability: Tony   (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ALT hooks, if proposed:
 * Alt 1: ... that weapons, like the Ayudhapurusha (pictured), are sometimes personified in Hindu art? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ayudhapurusha is not a weapon like a sword or spear. It is the human depiction of any divine weapon like a mace, bow, sword etc. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 16:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * ALT 2: ... according to Hindu epic Ramayana, Jaya gave birth to fifty powerful magical divine weapons?-- Redtigerxyz  Talk 16:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC) Looks better: the text says "magical", which is hooky. ... to 50 magical divine weapons?" The ref tag is there for ALT2; does it match with the current pic?  Tony   (talk)  02:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The pic should be excluded. As Gada (mace) is a woman-weapon not part of the weapon-sons of Jaya. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 15:48, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Article
 * Length: Tony  (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Vintage: Tony  (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Tony  (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutrality: Looks OK Tony   (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: On trust with the book. Tony   (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Copyvio: Tony   (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: Not bad. Needed the dash script (please see edit summary). Tony   (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments/discussion: You could remove the orphan tag. Tony  (talk)  04:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)