Template talk:Did you know/Fantasy Studios

Fantasy Studios

 * ... that Fantasy Studios was built on profits from hit songs by Creedence Clearwater Revival?
 * Reviewed: Pilbara Toadlet
 * Comment: This article was moved from user's namespace on July 26

Created by Skallikat (talk). Nominated by Binksternet (talk) at 04:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC) Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed: Hook
 * Length, format, content rules: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Source: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Interest: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Image suitability, if applicable: None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article
 * Length: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Vintage: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): References are almost bare URLs. A couple parts, like the last paragraph of Today, are uncited. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutrality: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Looks fine Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Copyvio: Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Comments/discussion:
 * Symbol question.svg A couple referencing issues, then this is golden. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I put up some more references. Binksternet (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Still lacking (Studio C, and Studio D have unreferenced paragraphs; Studio D and Studio management have unreferenced paragraphs). I still see some BURLs too. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, references are beefed up and bare URLs are handled. Binksternet (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I hate to be a drag, but there are still some unsourced statements. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I, too, see some unsourced statements but nothing that sticks out as controversial or extraordinary. I also see that the paragraphs are cited in accordance with the extra DYK rule of thumb #D2 that one reference should be in each paragraph, as a minimum. Yes, I can keep working on this article but I would rather spend my time on other articles. Binksternet (talk) 02:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Seems to check out. If another editor feels uncomfortable with the sourcing, feel free to overrule this tick. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)