Template talk:Did you know/Romans in Slovakia

Romans in Slovakia

 * ... that Marcus Aurelius wanted to create a new province called Marcomannia for modern-day Romans in Slovakia?
 * Reviewed: new nominator
 * Comment: while I think the hook may be appealing for this new article, reviewers will note it is difficult to verify the claim re: Marcomannia in independent sources in English

Created by T56b (talk). Nominated by Bavic1 (talk) at 19:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC) Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook
 * Length, format, content rules: ALT1. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Source: ALT1. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Interest: Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Image suitability, if applicable: None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article
 * Length: Aymatth2 (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Vintage: Aymatth2 (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Some paragraphs are completely unsourced. URLs are rather bare. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutrality: Aymatth2 (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: AGF on foreign language sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Copyvio: Images seem fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Comments/discussion: The hook makes absolutely no sense. Are there Romans in modern-day Slovakia, or indeed any modern-day Romans? Is Marcus Aurelius a modern-day character? I would correct the hook myself, but I don't know exactly what it means to emphasize chronologically. The article itself needs serious copyediting in this respect: for one, it uses, in the very first line, the false friend "actual" for what I presume should say "present-day" or similar. Dahn (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Dahn, you are absolutely right. Further, I would say the current name of the article is problematic for a DYK nomination in general as it is self-contradictory and difficult to contextualize. I have not alternative suggestions and suggest we drop it from DYK nomination. Bavic1 (talk) 20:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Agreed. Refused per above concerns. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I disagree. The title is confusing and the article could use some copy editing, but the topic is valid: the occupation by Romans of the area that is now Slovakia. I have renamed the article to Marcomannia, which fits the content better, and suggest ALT1 below. Not sure how to clean up the nomination when the article name has changed... Aymatth2 (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ALT1 ... that Marcus Aurelius wanted to create a new Roman province called Marcomannia in what is today Slovakia?
 * Symbol question.svg Sourcing needs to be addressed. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I have expanded, condensed, reworded, rearranged and added sources for most assertions including the tag. It is still far from perfect, but probably good enough. Needs a fresh pair of eyes. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks better, but I still see citation needed tags. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I generally like to leave one or two flaws in any article to avoid tempting the evil eye, which tends to be jealous of perfection. This is a fairly easy rule to follow. But I have replaced the citation needed tags by citations or removed the content that was not cited in this case. I don't think there is anything controversial about the topic. It all happened a long time ago and there were no obvious heroes or villains as far as I can see, apart from Attila maybe. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:56, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg ALT1 is good to go, referencing is up to the current consensus (minimum 1 per paragraph) Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)