Template talk:Did you know nominations/Rubicon (protein)

RE suggestions from @TompaDompa
thanks so much for your comprehensive review of the Rubicon article (the comments are of higher quality than most of the academic life science peer reviews I've seen).

Apologies if this talk page is not the right place for this discussion (if that's the case, please let me know).

RE your bulleted comments, I've accepted all of your suggestions, editing the article accordingly.

RE the DYK submission, where do we go from here? Should I edit it? You're right that the citation doesn't quite substantiate the hook; here is a new suggestion (inspired by your clever suggestion):


 * Hook: DYK that genetically crossing (out) the Rubicon (protein) reduces hallmarks of aging in roundworms, fruit flies, and mice?
 * Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381146/

Prodigiousfool (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Discussion is generally held at the main Template:Did you know nominations/Rubicon (protein) page, not at the talk page. That way it's easily visible to everyone and all the discussion is in one place. TompaDompa (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)