Template talk:Did you know nominations/Zapad 2009

Comment

 * thanks for making the promotion, but leaving me a bon mot in the comments was somewhat bizarre. When you say, "I would have suggested getting rid of 'might have' altogether," yeah I see that makes sense. However, as I couldn't read all the sources, being ambiguous made sense. what do you think of this hook:
 * Alt2 ... that the Russian and Belarussian Zapad 2009 military exercise involved nuclear-capable ballistic missiles? --evrik (talk) 03:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Evrik That would be fine as well, as I no source contradicts this. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've made the switch.-- Laun chba ller 09:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)