Template talk:Disambig-Class

Tag
editprotected

Please tag this with protected template and add to Category:Classification templates. heqs ·:. 10:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ Tra (Talk) 13:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect ?
redirects to

should not this redirect to

This would allow the standard links to WikiProject pages within each instance of the template use. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  11:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ Done - Good idea, the templates are equivalent in nature and completely intercompatible. Nihiltres { t .l } 16:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Redirect more
Would anyone oppose moving Disambig-Class to Disambiguation-Class? We could keep the text as "Disambig", but when displayed on a project template it will (by default) say "This article has been rated as Disambiguation-Class on the assessment scale", instead of "This article has been rated as Disambig-Class on the assessment scale".  JohnnyMrNinja  07:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * We could also keep the redirects (for ease of use), and maybe have a bot cleanup so it displays properly.  JohnnyMrNinja  07:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * My preference is to match whatever the associated category is in Category:Articles by quality. Since the category is currently called Category:Disambig-Class articles, that's what I'd like to keep it as.  But I would not object to renaming both the category and this template to Disambiguation-Class.  If your goal is to have "This article has been rated as Disambiguation-Class on the assessment scale" on project templates, moving this template will not have that effect.  You need to change the value of the class paramater on each talk page.  You could create Disambiguation-Class as a redirect to here, and then use   to have the text display as you want it to.  --Scott Alter 07:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Brought it here.  JohnnyMrNinja  08:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Scott. Better to leave it alone. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 10:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Scott said "I would not object to renaming both the category and this template to Disambiguation-Class",. You agree with this?  JohnnyMrNinja  17:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You have to do both or neither, not only one. He also would prefer to keep it as is, as would I. "Disambig" is shorter for one thing. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 18:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)