Template talk:Duck Commander

Wikilinks
I don't have any issues about "see also" text and wikilinks in ANY navbox, because as long as it's useful or helpful in some way and related to the topic then they its fine by me, but at the same time I feel that navboxes should ONLY be added to articles which are the primary topic of the navbox. If the lesser-related wikilinks in a navbox don't have an extremely-close relationship to the primary subject matter of the navbox, then I feel that it shouldn't be included in those lesser articles, primarily to prevent articles from being flooded with lesser-related navboxes. • Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 21:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I thought I fixed all of that? It's limited to the family and media appearances related to the company. Jhenderson  7 7 7  21:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, I agree with what you did, and I didn't mean this to be taken to mean anything negative by it. •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 21:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

employees
What should this section be called? Phil Robertson is not an employee. He just owns half the company, selling the other half to his son Willie. Also Sadie surely gets money from being on the show, and from singing on the Christmas album. Perhaps just put them altogether as the Duck Commander family. I renamed it Owners or Employees for now.  D r e a m Focus  22:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "Duck Commander family" sounds fine to me. Jhenderson  7 7 7  00:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * How about my last edit? I basically cited this. The first four are also the featured characters. in thie website. Jhenderson  7 7 7  15:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that works.  D r e a m Focus  22:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok good. I don't know about you...but the navbox doesn't seem to update itself on some articles when I see it. So I am going to have to purge some of them.  Jhenderson  7 7 7  02:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)