Template talk:Duke Nukem series

Next line
Shouldn't this be on the next line, since it is not part of the series proper? Rhindle The Red 01:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Manhattan Project
 * Land Of The Babes
 * Time To Kill
 * Done. Hbdragon88 07:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

The template
What is wrong with the way, the template is at currently? TheGameMuster, 3 June, 2011 (UTC)

Please keep Other games as Spin-Off series
I've been getting mail saying that the template is incorrect and confusing and they suggested me to change Other games to Spin-Off series to keep the template simple and straight to the point. And they also said to me to other editors "Please do NOT change until further notice." Darkness2005 22:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Who emailed you? Who said do not change? Where's this discussion you mentioned in the edit comment? TH 1 RT 3 EN talk ♦ contribs 00:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * As I said before, I've been getting mail saying that the template is incorrect and confusing and they suggested me to change Other games to Spin-Off series to keep the template simple and straight to the point. And they also said to me to other editors "Please do NOT change until further notice." Darkness2005 01:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Uh, okay, but again, whom? This is an open wiki and a non-protected template, who's going to tell you to change the template to their liking and still have the authority to protect it via proxy wiki user? Can I send you an email telling you not to change the Duke Nukem series template and you'll follow that? TH 1 RT 3 EN talk ♦ contribs 03:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Template layout
I want to leave it as it is, with the developement on the "related articles". Not where it would be, where it would be an add-on to the game. TheGameMuster, 21 June, 2011 (UTC)
 * You're ignoring intermediate updates. Please don't instantly revert. Please keep Other games as Spin-Off series. And also use Updated template to update it. (Added by 81.135.120.156)
 * That was added by an anon using the same language as my edit comment. That is NOT me as anon 81.135.120.156, who appears to be User:Darkness2005. As for changing it based on "I want", please discuss it here because that too is pretty much a violation of WP:OWN. Your reverts ignore other changes not related to the development article location. My changes explained:


 * Duke Nukem 64 does not have a dedicated section in the article, it's only mentioned in a list of DN3D ports. No reason to give this precedence over the other ports.
 * Do we need the non-linked games in here as well? Especially now since there's a List of Duke Nukem media page?
 * Removing the "Duke Nukem" from the titles. This is fine with subtitled games, but I really, really hate clicking on single or double characters (e.g., II) when there's plenty of room for the full name.
 * Development article would be better suited near the game's article link, but I've now moved it to a section on non-game articles as a compromise. How's that?


 * Any other issues? TH 1 RT 3 EN talk ♦ contribs 22:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, the GBC version of Duke Nukem II. Should it be mentioned in the template? User:Darkness2005, 00:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Does it have it's own article or a dedicated section in an article? TH 1 RT 3 EN talk ♦ contribs 06:20, 25 June 2011 (UTC)


 * It's actually a handheld port of Duke Nukem II, it has its own sub-section in the Duke Nukem II article. User:Darkness2005, 00:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)