Template talk:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia talk:Contact us

Consistency
This will make the edit notice consistent with the notice on the talk page.

--Bsherr (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Edit notice edited. Amalthea  16:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Amalthea. I thought perhaps it should be a content type on the edit notice and a notice type on the talk page. Maybe that distinction isn't necessary. But maybe both should be content type? (I see, via transclusion, you made both notice type, but I wasn't sure whather you noticed that.) What do you think? --Bsherr (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The type only affects the icon and the box border: "content" is a bit more aggressive, with an exclamation mark and a thick orange border. Consistency would probably ask that we use editnotice style here. No opinion on which is more appropriate for the case at hand, I only made it a notice so that I could transclude it in the /Header page without any visual change to your version. But say the word and Ichange it. Amalthea  17:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I want to try to follow the standardization, but I never understood why editnotices are intentionally devoid of color or images. As to the mbox type, whatever you think is more consistent with the guidelines. --Bsherr (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, I standardized. Editnotices don't *need* to be transparent, but it's a good default. Amalthea  18:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, well, that's just silly! :-) Recoding mbox makes it so that changes to mbox, if they ever occur, don't get rolled out to this edit notice. Could you change it back, please? --Bsherr (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * How's that? Amalthea  20:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * What does that do? --Bsherr (talk) 20:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I see. It still defeats all the default parameters of tmbox. I think it would be better as you first implemented it. --Bsherr (talk) 20:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Man, I can't sneak anything by you. ;) An editnotice really needs to have width 100%, otherwise it looks just inconsistent in the midst of those other full-width system messages, that's why I'd rather not use an mbox. Anyway, hope we can agree on the current solution. Cheers, Amalthea  10:07, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I can teach you something new? Using mbox, set style = margins: 0em 0em. That'll make it full width. --Bsherr (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)