Template talk:Editnotices/Namespace/Template

Link to documentation
I propose the following addition to this page, which will remind editors to update the documentation subpage (if it exists) when editing the template. Any comments welcome. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I've stuck it in. I probably should have discussed this somewhere first, but couldn't think of the best place. Anyhow, revert at will, if it's not wanted. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sweet. Amalthea  15:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Link to sandbox
I've stuck in a link to the template /sandbox, if it exists. Hope this is useful, if not please revert. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit request
Could a CSS ID be added for each individual edit notice, so that they're inline with other generic namespace editnotices. Thanks in advance, — James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:34pm • 13:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Which individual editnotices ? This is a namespace editnotice. Suggestions for naming patterns ?? —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 19:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There are 5 separate editnoticed loaded by this page. I guess the OP is asking for each of them to have a separate ID. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * James, could you please make the required changes in a sandbox somewhere and reactivate the request? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Editnotice text change
Hi all,

at the helpdesk a question was posted about the text "When making changes to this template please be sure to update its documentation". This text is an editnotice on templates that have a documentation page (example). The user was making a minor content change and got scared by the editnotice. I propose changing the text. I propose: "When making major changes to this template please be sure to update its documentation". Feedback is very welcome.

Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * A link to this discussion has been placed at Wikipedia talk:Editnotice
 * Since it has been two weeks without feedback, and considering that it is a minor change, I would like to request that an admin make the suggested change. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't have the rights to make this change. But for the record, I agree with it. --ais523 00:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)a


 * ✅ --j⚛e deckertalk 00:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you. - Taketa (talk) 08:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 23 July 2021
Copy from Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Template/sandbox to remove a bunch of obsolete code related to print versions of templates (see Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 13) * Pppery * it has begun... 00:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ this just went live, if there are any issues you see please ping me here. —  xaosflux  Talk 18:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Edit request 1 August 2022
I suggest removing. It pops up in VE and on mobile and it seems just like Captain Obvious?

Alternatively it could be wrapped within, that won't help on desktop but it's something. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 22:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ I added the   class to it, that should exempt it from WP:ENOM. —  xaosflux  Talk 00:54, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As far as if it should be otherwise removed - a bit more discussion may be useful there first. — xaosflux  Talk 00:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 9 April 2024
Change links to plainlinks without the "external link logo" as described here Toadette  ( Let's talk together! ) 17:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ — xaosflux  Talk 17:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The construct  can nearly always be simplified - the   attribute is valid on all HTML elements (without exception), so we may put   - but even that can be simplified, because the  template accepts a class parameter, so  is all that is necessary. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)