Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Ahmadiyya in Pakistan

Template-protected edit request on 11 August 2021
Please copy Template:Editnotices/Page/Ahmadiyya to this page. FDW777 (talk) 11:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , is there consensus somewhere that the editnotice should be extended to this page as well? Thanks! firefly  ( t · c ) 14:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Well the edit notice says Islam and Muslim appear in the article, per talk page discussion. The official name of the group is the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, and standing consensus from discussion at the talk page is that Ahmadiyya is part of Islam. This is a sub-article of the main article, so the same applies. It would be a bizarre state of affairs if the main article used the terms Muslim and Islam, yet this article didn't. FDW777 (talk) 14:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Usually edit notices are used when there is substantial disruption or consensus that the page should have an edit notice. In this case since the edit notice would not be on the original page, the discussion should probably be linked.
 * (I will close and request CSD in 24 hours if there has been no discussion since I don't see frequest removal of content and this request has been open for 5 days) Terasail [✉️] 12:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Define "frequent". I see 22 March, 19 April, 22 April, 3 May, 3 June, 3 June, 26 July, 11 August. Other than simple vandalism, that's most of the edits since March which is when I started checking from. FDW777 (talk) 13:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I am not sure that 8 edits in 6 months is frequent (I would say 3+ a month is frequent) and with most of those edits being clear vandalism a request at WP:RFPP for semi-protection of the page may be a better option. Edit noticies can only be seen by desktop users, so it might not have the desired effect, which is why I lean decline without a consensus to add. Terasail [✉️] 14:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I feel like an edit notice is a less drastic step than blocking off a lot of users from being able to edit. Three of the above diffs by my count were not by mobile users, so it seems like it could be at least somewhat useful. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 16:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * See the WP:CALIPH notice and Senate resolution condemns misleading Google, Wikipedia search results about the “present Islamic caliph” regarding this. Mirza Masroor Ahmad, the leader of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, is currently extended confirmed protected for a year (and I have little doubt that protection will be renewed some time after shortly after it expires), that article talk page has also been repeatedly semi-protected in 2021, and is currently semi-protected until 5 October. Maybe it's just me, but I'd consider an edit notice asking editors not to make a certain edit to be a much softer solution than those employed elsewhere for the disruption around these articles. FDW777 (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ I may have been slightly too cautious about creating this editnotice. I set an expiary of 1 year to see if there is a decrease in vandalism.  Terasail [✉️] 17:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I probably should have explained more about the history of disruption in this area before. FDW777 (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2021 (UTC)