Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Berenstain Bears

Berenstain Bears has a persistent problem of good-faith editors attempting to "correct" the spelling of the name Berenstain to "Berenstein", "Bearnstein", or other variation ending in "stein". I request an editnotice to reduce the number of these good-faith edits. Mmyers1976 (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to make this edit notice (even if it's only true in this universe), but could you make it look a bit less jarring? This doesn't pass WP:CONTRAST. See this tool. ~ RobTalk 16:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, WP:CONTRAST isn't an issue because it isn't the text vs background that is jarring, but the color combination is still quite blaring. Something like Template:Editnotices/Page/List of ships of the Second World War would achieve the same "eye-catching" quality without visually assaulting our editors. ~ RobTalk 17:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Is the color a deal killer? I borrowed it from Template:Editnotices/Page/Muhammad which is an approved template. The object is, after all, to catch the attention of the random drive-by IP editors who keep making this "correction", I don't know what we gain by subtlety. Mmyers1976 (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say it's a deal killer (in the sense that another TE/admin would probably be happy to implement it), but the colors here are bright/jarring enough that they hurt my eyes on a screen with medium brightness. I don't think that's desirable. A sufficiently "cautionary" image (such as File:Imbox content.png) or even large text in another color (such as at Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:Did you know/Queue) can achieve the same effect. My point is that you don't need the bizarrely bright yellow to be non-subtle. ~ RobTalk 18:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, how about the above? Mmyers1976 (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ ~ RobTalk 18:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Mmyers1976 (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)