Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Higgs boson

Edit request on 21 August 2013‎
Source 24 (found at the bottom of the first paragraph under "Overview") for the article Higgs boson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson) claimed to cite evidence that the Standard Model did not explain gravity. The source leads here, ( http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/the-cern-tech-that-helped-track-down-the-god-particle/815?tag=nl.e101/ ), and this website does not support that claim, nor is it a credible source for such an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.38.179 (talk) 06:41, 21 August 2013‎
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template . Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. The talk page concerned will be Talk:Higgs boson. -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 25 March 2015
I've fixed the faulty interpretation of the sigma values in the main text; I'd like to suggest including a warning not to alter the interpretation back to (v commonly held) misconception. Thanks Robma (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Robma (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —  18:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 21 November 2016
Please remove the first part of the edit notice telling users not to say the Higgs boson has been discovered. CERN stopped being cautious about their wording in 2013, and now say unambiguously and confidently that the Higgs has been discovered. The part about beyond-standard-model physics is a non-argument. Dukwon (talk) 21:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Izno (talk) 21:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)