Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Jesus

BC/AC
The date format should that should now be used is the BC/AD one only. This is established by a recent rfc.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Please complete the following template with the wording you require (or do you want the notice removed?), then reactivate. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to use that template, but this is what the edit notice should say:

--- "Please do not change the way dates are expressed in this article, unless you have attained consensus with other editors on the talk page of this article. Based on the consensus in this request for comment dates should remain as they are (i.e., with BC/AD only). The only exceptions apply to quotations used within the text, which should not be altered.

The lead paragraphs were created by consensus after considerable discussion by a variety of editors. Out of courtesy for this process, please discuss any proposed changes on the talk page before editing it."

--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 14:14, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, ✅ &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

possessive of Jesus
Per this decision, this text needs to be added to the Edit Notice as a 3rd paragraph:

This article uses the apostrophe-only possessive: Jesus' not Jesus's Do not change usage within quotes. (see FAQ)

Thanks. —Telpardec TALK  03:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Technical 13 (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)