Template talk:Editnotices/Page/List of actors in gay pornographic films

edit protected Hi, Please create notice with the following, or quite similar text:

Thank you! -- Banj e b oi   09:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, your second bullet-point is really hard to understand! Could you have a go at clarifying it? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Does that help? -- Banj e  b oi   10:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I understand now. However, the reason it is confusing is that links to existing articles are blue not red! So it is not really correct to say "Please do not remove redlinks", is it? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Aha! You're so right! Does this help or should we split the points? -- Banj e  b oi   13:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you MSGJ! -- Banj e b oi   08:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I did my best to simplify it. Took out a lot of the bold as well. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries, I have so much work to do I hope it helps a bit - thanks again! -- Banj e  b oi   08:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

The admonishment to "not remove red links, as this lets people know that an article is needed" is a huge presumption of a suitability for inclusion and editors are free to remove redlinks if they feel them unwarranted. Please remove this. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * On reflection I think I agree. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)