Template talk:Editnotices/Page/List of films voted the best

Template-protected edit request on 20 October 2016
An "inclusion criteria" for the list currently exists on the talk page. It reads as follows:

Since most editors will not be aware of its existence I propose adding a copy to the main article so editors will be exposed to it when they edit the article. This criteria is a long-standing aspect of the article and has governed content for years and reflects the general consensus.

Betty Logan (talk) 17:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I've enacted the request to create an Editnotice, and made a variation of the current talk page notice that you posted above. It's not as verbose, and I believe would get the point across reasonably. If there need to be any modifications, please re-open here or ping. Thanks, — Andy W. ( talk ) 18:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 5 December 2016
Two things:
 * Please remove the words "usually" and "enough" in the sentence "Editorial picks by the staff of a periodical or website are usually not sufficiently broad enough in their scope to be included." per Talk:List of films considered the best and for grammar reasons, respectively.
 * Please add a fourth bullet point with the text "For further details, see the consensus headbar on the talk page." or some variation thereof. That way brevity is retained but editors are alerted that there are more things to consider.

Thanks in advance. TompaDompa (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)