Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Talk:COVID-19

Template-protected edit request on 7 April 2020
Please add the following edit notice to this page mirroring the ones at Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Donald Trump/Current consensus, Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic/Current consensus, and Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19/Current consensus. (It's perhaps a little extreme, but it gets the job done and will be seen only by a small group of EC editors and I'm too lazy to redesign it.)

&#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 02:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done S.A. Julio (talk) 02:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * WOW this is bad (no one can ever edit this??) ...we never tell editors not to edit or follow WP:Bold... needs to be reworded to comply with our policies on editing and not threaten editors off the bat ...Changed to " Editors should review established consensus on the talk page before editing this page. Please note that repeated disruption caused to this list  may result in an immediate block.".-- Moxy 🍁 16:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This notice is not for the article or for the talk page, but for the list of consensuses at the talk page; here's an example of a similar, more developed one. WP:Bold doesn't apply to the process of determining consensus, so I don't see much of an issue. Determining consensus is a task for very experienced editors (thus part of why the page is EC-protected), so a notice that discourages those less comfortable from editing is, for a list like this which should be pretty stable, a good thing. That said, your changes aren't messing up anything major, so if you want to retain them, I won't fight it. Given that current consensus lists seem to be spreading, I'd recommend converting the banner to a template at some point. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 16:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * oh, just noticed you also changed "any disruption" to "repeated disruption". That introduces a contradiction with "immediately". For that part, could you revert and discuss at talk to see if there's consensus to make the change? &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 16:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Best we tell editors to proceed with caution instead of telling them to fuck off....nor should we tell them they will be banned for one edit. ...They will be blocked if a problem is ongoing. as not all see disruption in the same manner -- Moxy 🍁
 * I'd appreciate having a third opinion on this. Would you mind self-reverting that part on this and the other pages where you made the change until we have that? &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 17:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Best if you want to post a message that is the opposite of our editing policy that you seek consensus to tell editors they cant edit a page that is not fully protected.  Fell free to ask for more input.-- Moxy 🍁 19:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)