Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

Requested change for expanding scope
Change "The exact statement(s) in the article that the source is supporting" to "The exact statement(s) or other content in the article that the source is supporting." So that readers understand that, along with textual claims, this also applies just as well to graphs, maps, equations, etc. -- Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 21:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done -- Red rose64 (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 11 May 2022
In the sentence Do not base your RfC solely on Media Bias/Fact Check (RSP entry), as it not a reliable source, an "is" is missing: "as it is not a reliable source". Renerpho (talk) 07:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Renerpho (talk) 07:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Terasail [✉️] 14:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Suggested changes to the edit notice
I've started a discussion about this template here WT:RSN. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 20:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Replacement of the edit notice
As per the consensus at WT:RSN please replace the entire edit notice with the one found here. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 11:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * EggRoll97 (talk) 23:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ EggRoll97 (talk) 23:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks EggRoll97. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 00:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 22 November 2023
I suggest changing "Certain types of sources have specifically guidelines" to "Certain types of sources have specific guidelines". Perception312 (talk) 00:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ well spotted! &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)