Template talk:Embraer aircraft

Consistency of listings
I think that there should be more consistency in what does and doesn't get listed here. Some aircraft are listed both with trade name and type name, such as the Embraer Phenom 100, which is listed both as EMB 500 and Phenom 100, whereas others are not even listed individually, such as the E170/E175/E190/E195, which are collectively listed as the E-Jets. I think that we should at least list all of the trade names (e.g. add E170/E175/E190/E195 with proper redirects). I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not the families should be listed, but it should be consistent (right now the ERJ-145 family is not listed, but the E-Jets family is). I have a slight preference for removing the type names and keeping the trade names (e.g. EMB 505 should be removed and Phenom 300 should be kept). Scotteaton92 (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)