Template talk:Expandsection

Indented template
Does the template have to be indented? -- JD [ don't talk|email ] 18:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't see why it needs to be; seems unlikely to be mistaken as part of an article. Regards, David Kernow 21:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Would somebody be able to remove the indent then please? I would do it myself, but what I thought affected the indent, didn't, when I previewed it afterwards.  -- JD [ don't talk|email ] 22:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Have removed the indenting produced by  in the   at the top of the template's code, but the class assigned to the template, class="notice noprint", appears to add a small indent of its own. I'm unsure whether it's wise to declassify. Thanks for spotting, David 23:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Background colo/ur
Per here, have amended background to "neutral" white. Regards, David Kernow 16:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

An opposite template is needed?
I don’t see a template anywhere. Does anyone know of one, or something similar? What I have in mind is those cases where a rather peripheral topic fires the enthusiasm of a number of specialists (or obsessives!) and the section becomes expanded to the point where it just unbalances the article as a whole. I am rather tempted to create one. Any thoughts? —Ian Spackman 15:58, 23 November 2006 (UTC)