Template talk:Extra chronology/Archive 1

Sample
When used with Infobox Single code similar to the this:

Can produce output like this:

Also with Infobox Single, you can use code like this:

To produce output like this:

=Discussion=

Square brackets in the instructions
Are we leaving the brackets in the usage instructions, or should they be removed, as with Template:Infobox Single? Flowerparty ☀ 23:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Broken
Could some please revert the last change by Ed g2s again? It still seems to break all usages of Infobox Single that use the chronology... --Fritz S. (Talk) 18:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This is urgent, he also broke any use of with a second chonrology field. &mdash; Ian Moody (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * reverted. Flowerparty ☀ 20:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Valign
"center" is no a valid value for the valign attribute. I suppose it should be valign="middle". --Stijn Vermeeren 11:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Background field
A concern was raised recently over at the Wikiproject talk page for albums, regarding the clash observed when this template is used in articles. Is there any particular reason '#ffff00' was the assigned value for the background? Is it possible to have the background be determined by the the album infobox background instead? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 15:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) has a problem connected to this. As well as being an album, it needs an entry in the singles chronology (an edited version was released as a 45). The colour is wrong, but with the album infobox colours in a state of flux at the moment changing it manually wouldn't be a great idea.... can this be fixed? --kingboyk 14:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC) See also Infobox Album/color --kingboyk 16:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Text Size
In a regular single infobox the previous, current, and next single are in small text size, but when the Extra Chronology is used, it's regular sized. Shouldn't they match up and both be small>? --Thankyoubaby 15:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree. It's fixed now. --Kristbg 22:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Colour help with Extra track listing
Could someone possibly go over to the Extra tracklisting template and add a Type field similar to this template? To distinguish track listings of EPs, compilations etc. -- Reaper  X  19:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Get documentation to subpage
editprotected Could we move the documentation to a subpage, Template:Extra chronology/doc? --Lockal (talk) 17:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Flowerparty ☀ 18:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)