Template talk:Frequency list

Why does Template:Frequency list put Academic Word List under Add-ons?
Shouldn't this just be listed under English? It's not an add-on for every language. Plus, "frequency list" does not necessarily mean "absolute frequency."

If it needs to be in a separate section, "Add-ons" is short but otherwise a horrible header for a word list based on frequency in certain areas. "Auxiliary English List" or "Category-specific English List" might be better, but I still think removing the header and placing the link under English would be best.

Sorry all I can do is point this out, but my real-life limitations are getting in the way of doing this myself and I might not make it back here. Thanks in advance if you can work on this! — Geekdiva (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

"Tests" are not "Lists"
A "Test" is not a "List"! Currently the template has Chinese and Japanese tests, although these seem to have directly associated with them some sorts of word lists. I will revise the wording to reflect a focus on the lists, not the tests. For the Korean test (TOPIK) there is no evidence of it being directly associated with any list, so I have removed that reference. —DIV (120.17.21.104 (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC))