Template talk:GNF Protein box/Archive 3

Edit request from JaGa, 18 April 2010
Change


 * label4     = Symbol

to


 * label4     = Symbol

Why? Because HUGO can also refer to HUGO (cable system) so the HUGO redirect will probably become a dab some day. (Someone did just this the but I reverted it to avoid 11,000+ disambig links; but really, they have a valid argument, especially considering how sparse the Human Genome Org article is.)

 Ja Ga  talk 22:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Also please change Gene ontology (double redirect) to Gene Ontology. Boghog (talk) 23:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ Bypassed both redirects as requested. --CapitalR (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- Ja Ga  talk 21:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Show gene ontology
I think, that "Gene Ontology" have to be shown per COLLAPSE, because it can not hide article content. Showing the function of the protein is the main part of the box. --Snek01 (talk) 10:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Since the guideline you linked to above specifically notes that "collapsible sections are useful in navboxes or infoboxes", I tend to think that the template is fine as it is. Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

update template
If an administrator would be so kind as to make these changes to this protected template, we'd appreciate it. These changes were discussed at Portal:Gene_Wiki/Discussion, prototyped at GNF_Protein_box/sandbox with testcases at GNF_Protein_box/testcases. The changes serve to make the protein structure section collapsible (and collapsed by default) and to add links to the primary sources for Gene Ontology annotations. Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting question.svg Question:. Does it also want the more recent change of adding "data1" at line 9? Rambo's Revenge (talk)  21:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've disabled the template for now. Please reactivate it when the requested clarification has been given and I or someone else will happily fulfil the request. Thanks, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That change hasn't specifically been discussed, but MSGJ appears to be a pretty experienced template editor and so I trust his/her addition. Plus, that change doesn't appear to actually affect the presentation of the template, but more an addition to comply with template norms.  Having said all that, yes, please make all accumulated changes.  Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 22:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. Rambo's Revenge (talk)  22:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

minor change
This change to fix a hyperlink, please... Thanks, AndrewGNF (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Skier Dude  ( talk  03:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

EGO / QuickGO
HI was speaking with some of the gene ontology folks at the EBI today, and they pointed out that "sources" link in this template is credited to "EGO" when the resource is now named "QuickGO". I propose to change this, but thought I would check there were no objections first. Rockpock e  t  14:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No objection from me! Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Rockpock  e  t  13:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

minor edits
Requesting that this change be made to the template to update URL linking syntax. Changes have been tested at Template:GNF_Protein_box/testcases. Best, Andrew Su (talk) 04:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  07:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Please use HTTPS for the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) links
The purpose of this edit is to provide increased privacy and security for users by having the template use HTTPS for links to the National Center for Biotechnology Information. On the Template:GNF Protein box/testcases page, the NCBI links under GNF Protein box (not the sandbox) appear to generate 301 Moved Permanently redirects to HTTPS versions of the links. In the template, please change each instance of  (there are 8 instances) to   instead. Thanks. --Elegie (talk) 07:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Cabayi (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 30 March 2019
I have relisted the TfD discussion - please change che March 20 link to March 30. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 16:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 19 July 2019
The template has been merged to Infobox gene. Please redirect this page there. The template is orphaned everywhere it would be considered appropriate to do so (ie I haven't edited anyone's user space or talk page archives). For the TfD discussion see Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 30. -- Trialpears (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ❌ the protection level has been reduced and you may now edit directly. —  xaosflux  Talk 13:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I wouldn't be surprised if I'll be in the same situation in the future where I've orphaned a template and want to redirect it following consensus at TfD. Is this the right way to go about it or should I go to WP:RFPP or protecting admin's talk page? -- Trialpears (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * it is sort of a case-by-case thing. If the usage has changed significantly from the last protection, right-sizing the protection is usually a good idea. —  xaosflux  Talk 17:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)