Template talk:Heathenry

RFC on "Historical Germanic religion"

 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Should the linked phrase  appear immediately below the image in the template (as it is now)? The same issue arises at Template:Slavic Native Faith. –Srnec (talk) 19:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please help us out. What is the issue here, for those who are not experts in heathenry and paganism? Jzsj (talk) 04:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Another editor has removed the link with this rationale in the edit summary: "Readers can only be expected to see this as meaning that this template refers to historical Germanic paganism, which it does not". I agree. Srnec (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Modern Paganism is an appropriate link. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  04:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I also agree this should be referred to as Modern Paganism. Historical Germanic religion presumes there was a single approach accepted in some time in the past, yet this is vague and not exactly what the picture depicts. --- FULBERT (talk) 00:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems pretty clear it should be Modern Paganism, since the top of the Heathenry article says "This article is about the modern Pagan new religious movement." BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.