Template talk:Iguanidae

"Class" entry
Hi Line 8 the Pink – according to the sources I can find, the taxonomical "class" for reptiles is still "Reptilia". Can you show me in reliable sources where this has changed to "Sauropsida"? According to the English Wikipedia's Reptile article, "Sauropsida" is a "clade", not a "class". I cannot find any reliable source that supports the position of the Korean Wikipedia. Please point me to some reliable sources if possible. Wikipedian Sign Language  Paine  03:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


 * For in Korea wikipedia, or about dinosaurs, they say sauropsida not reptila. I will find the image to show you about classes of the vertebrates.Line 8 the Pink (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * And it says in the Korean wikipedia about birds, it says 새는 분기분류법으로 석형강 공룡상목 조강에 속한다. It translates like "Bird class is Aves, but it is sauropsida, dinosauria, Aves." So that means sauropsid is a class. In Korean, 강 means class and 류 means unranked clade, but it says class.Line 8 the Pink (talk) 05:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * With all due respect to you and to the Korean Wikipedia, all of Wikipedia must use reliable sources from outside of Wikipedia. The links below are to reliable sources used in English Wikipedia articles, and all those sources show that the scientific community still uses "Reptilia" as the class for lizards, turtles and other reptiles.  And they show "Sauropsida" as unranked.  There cannot be two classes for any one animal in taxonomy, and the reptile class is still "Reptilia".  Wikipedian Sign Language  Paine   10:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, I had to remove the image from this page because it is a copyright violation and, according to Commons, it is not used anywhere on Wikipedia including not on the Korean Wikipedia. Please do not upload any images to Commons that are not free for all to see.  Wikipedian Sign Language  Paine   10:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

One more thing should be brought to your attention, Line 8 the Pink: You should be aware that this website is the Namu wiki, it is not the Korean Wikipedia. It is a wiki, but not Wikipedia. You should remember that wikis are not considered reliable sources on Wikipedia, and that includes Wikipedia itself. Your sources must be reliable if you want them to support your arguments. Wikipedian Sign Language  Paine  11:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)