Template talk:Indian Institutes of Technology

Ragging in IIT
Why was the link to Ragging in IIT deleted?

The ragging link was deleted because it redirected to Ragging, a general article, not one specific to the IITs. Additionally, the article is clearly of poor quality, and the word ragging is not very strongly linked to IITs so as to deserve a place on the IIT template banner. -- Keynes  John  Maynard  22:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

How is this template to be edited? An addition is to be made in one of the categories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhruvchokshi (talk • contribs) 19:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

New and Old
Do we need to keep it separate new and old ? --naveenpf (talk) 06:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Was the act passed? If not, the "old" ones (correct name is probably "amendment") are not IITs at all by law.--Muhandes (talk) 08:11, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Distinction between old/new IITs, redux
I am not sure we need to keep the distinction in this template. I actually don't even think sorting by year of establishment is a good idea. A navbox is used for navigation, maybe alphabetically is the best for navigation? Thoughts? --Muhandes (talk) 07:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)