Template talk:Infobox Grand Lodge/Archive 1

Flag
Can we take out the "flagcountry" from this? The flags are unlikely to add anything to the articles on which this template is used. --John (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Organ
Can we add "organ" to this, such as a magazine, journal or any other such periodic publication the Grand Lodge may have? Truther2012 (talk) 20:42, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Merge
Couldn't this one be merged into Template:Infobox organization, possibly just with one or two editions in the latter? Chicbyaccident (talk) 22:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Jurisdiction can't be linked

 * Discussion copied from WP:Village pump (technical)#Strange things. --Pipetricker (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

OK, I'll try to explain what happened. For some time, " ]]" appeared on the top of the article United Grand Lodge of England whether or not the category was present or removed. After checking the edit history, I found that it all started after this (seemingly unrelated) edit (if you check the previous versions of the article, it is not there). After seeing this, I decided to (manually, of course) undo what was done in this edit and this thing disappeared. My question is, what was the relation of this edit to the appearance of this thing? 94.65.133.34 (talk) 16:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I just figured that it happened because he had linked to England at the "jurisdiction" area. I will re-add the others, but this means that Infobox Grand Lodge might be a little broken if it leads to the appearance of such things. 94.65.133.34 (talk) 16:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * doesn't expect jurisdiction to be linked, since it uses that value as the sortkey for a category. Effectively, by using  what you have is , and you can't put links inside links. -- Red rose64 (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 01 June 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move the article has been established within the RM time period and thus defaulting to not moved. &mdash; Music1201  talk  02:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Grand Lodge → Template:Infobox grand lodge – This was apparently moved strictly for a perceived capitalization issue, but that is not reason enough to move a seven-year-old template. The editor in question has a bad habit of doing this. – MSJapan (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Philg88 ♦talk 04:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

This was apparently moved strictly for a perceived capitalization issue, but that is not reason enough to move a seven-year-old template. The editor in question has a bad habit of doing this. – MSJapan (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC) MSJapan (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note Original move reverted
 * Our article Grand Lodge does support the capitalization. Whether that is correct or not, I don't know, but the move was at least controversial and should have been an RM. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  21:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Basically the editor decided it was a noun and not a proper name (which is incorrect), and we've been having this sort of problem with him with other things like "Research Lodge" being moved to "Research lodge" in the past, so it really needs to go back and be discussed, if it's even pursued. MSJapan (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose as Grand Lodge uses caps. Find consensus to move that before moving this.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   08:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.