Template talk:Infobox UK Supreme Court case

Image
It's just my opinion, but maybe the Coat of Arms would serve as a better image, seems in line with other court case infoboxes.-- Tærkast (Discuss) 15:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe the Supreme Court has made some effort to distance itself from the royal coat of arms, their reasoning is covered here . I would have liked to use the badge of the court but we can't for copyright reasons, so I followed the Canadian precedent here Bob House 884 (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah fair enough. I missed that actually. The template looks pretty good anyway.-- Tærkast (Discuss) 16:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, its mostly stolen from the US version Bob House 884 (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * That's fine. I won't tell.-- Tærkast (Discuss) 17:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I suggest that this is duplicating the Template:Infobox court case, I've just updated that template to automatically use the image: UK Supreme Court badge.svg --Lindengr (talk)) 16:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry to revive this old thread, but doesn't use of the badge (File:Supreme court crest (official).svg) in this case fulfil WP:FUR under fair use? Legendiii (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

New sections
A section on the membership of the court, any interveners, and any interested parties in a case should be added. I am not sure how to or I would act boldly and do it myself. Sport and politics (talk) 11:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)