Template talk:Infobox United States District Court case

"Holding" field not working?
The "holding" parameter does not appear to work. For example, Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc., Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, & McLean v. Arkansas (just to pick the first three transclusions in the list at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Infobox United States District Court case) all include holdings; but the holding does not appear in the infobox. Specifying the "holding" parameter does cause the heading Holding to appear; but not the text of the holding itself. TJRC (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I figured it out and fixed it. Please revert and let me know if this munges anything. TJRC (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Can someone add a "plaintiff" field?
Can someone add a "plaintiff" field? I would do it myself, but I do not want to accidentally break a complex template. Right now we have "prosecution" and "defendant" - and "prosecution" is clearly incorrect in a civil case. Thanks --Neutralitytalk 03:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Why no "counsel for defendant" field?
or counsel for defendants(s) Thanks Rhadow (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I was unable to get the image to load for DDC when leaving image and imagesize blank
Geo8rge (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The problem seems to be the infobox template was not updated to include the image variable discussed in Template:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case. In my sandbox that code solved the problem. I don't know if I should make the change without authorization.  Should I? Geo8rge (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)