Template talk:Infobox frazione

Changing backend to use infobox settlement
Now that the TFD has closed, are there any objections to changing the backend? I have created a mock-up version in the sandbox, and here is the result. Any objections or suggestions? Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks much better, same should be done with the comune template. I think though the guy adding the frazione has been using the standard template anyway. Himalayan   16:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Very good! One question... can you center the map? --Francesco Betti Sorbelli (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * See also this --Francesco Betti Sorbelli (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The map centering problem is a problem in . I will see if it can be fixed upstream. Thanks. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Insert tags before and after  --Francesco Betti Sorbelli (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You were thinking the same thing I was, but I was looking for a CSS solution if it exists. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I gave up and added &lt;center> tags to . I am still waiting for a CSS solution, but until then this works. 04:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Notwithstanding that I have listed the closure at WP:DRV, the new version is much better; and of course benefits our readers, by being laid out like (and stylistically in keeping with) other instances of . Please go ahead and implement it. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 17:28, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed edit
I propose the following edit (which is partly analogous to that made to Template:Infobox Italian comune). This proposed change is contained in this template's sandbox: 1) Creating a new parameter called and making it a binary option with , so that an editor can use one or the other (this is to accommodate the creation of metropolitan cities in 2015). 2) Creating a tracking category called "Category:Pages using Infobox frazione with administrative division issues" that would contain articles that use this infobox with either:
 * A) No  parameter.
 * B) No  or   parameter.
 * C) Both  and   parameters.
 * D) No  parameter.

3) Creating distinct preview warnings for each of the four scenarios above. 4) Creating an unknown parameter tracking category and preview warning. 5) Creating an exception to the above tracking category and preview warning for frazioni in the region of Aosta Valley, which contains no provinces or metropolitan cities. When "Aosta" is entered in the  parameter (including when   is entered via RegioneIT), the article will not be placed in the tracking category and the preview warning will not appear if   or   are not used.  Ergo Sum   18:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done After notifying the relevant wikiprojects and allowing an adequate amount of time for comments, I have gone forth with the proposal on the live template.  Ergo Sum  16:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Preview warning and hatnotes moving to templatestyles
Page watchers may be interested in Izno (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)