Template talk:Irrational number

Recent amendments
I want to scrutinize the current contents and growth of this template. These are my hypotheses: Accordingly, I suggest to Especially point #2 allows for broad discussions, and the others are no axioms, of course. Purgy (talk) 07:50, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Irrational numbers are a meaningful category within the reals (no i, or any other number systems)
 * 2) "Almost all" reals are irrational (only prominent representatives in the template, most prominent: $\pi$)
 * 3) All roots are irrational, except for respective powers of rationals
 * 4) Transcendental functions do not preserve rationals
 * 5) For an overview, consult the article on irrational numbers
 * remove a good deal of the many scarcely known constants, some roots and ln-s, and to
 * stop adding new, only scarcely known constants to the template, but rather to the article on irrationals, and to
 * agree on some ordering of the entries (value, alphabetically, importance, ...).