Template talk:Lang-sr-Latn

Italics
Italicization of the argument should be removed to make this template consistent with the rest of Balto-Slavic multilingual support templates don't. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌ I just checked - several templates in that category do use italics. And wouldn't this violate MOS:FOREIGN? Tra (Talk) 01:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I could fix them too. This template makes use of Language with name, so MOS:FOREIGN compatibility should be addressed there.


 * I created this template for the specific purpose of being able to italicize Serbian Latin foreign phrases :) Because Cyrillic ones can't be, for reasons explained at Template talk:Lang-sr - see MOS:Ety. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 15:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * And I'm pretty sure that mixed slant as in:
 * violates WP:MOS more. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * violates WP:MOS more. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Your example seems to be contrived - I've never actually seen that happen in practice. And even if it did, MOS:Ety still applies. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 15:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) Making the other templates italic is one option, and so is editing Language with name. But as it stands, the MOS does require foreign words to be in italic so unless there's a discussion somewhere saying otherwise, I can't just go ahead and remove it here. Tra (Talk) 15:35, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Another option could be to add " Latin" into the text/link created by this template. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Personally I have no problem with absent "Latin" part: "Latin" is de-facto dominant in Serbian anyway. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I found out that this way of dealing with italics is a recommended one, so the issue is now resolved. I'll change the other templates in category instead. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2012 (UTC)