Template talk:Mars Quads - By Name

Created "Template talk:Mars Quads - By Name" Page - a/o October 29, 2012 - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 18:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Copying to Commons
I'm beginning to flesh out the quadrangle categories on Commons, so I copied this template to Commons:Template:Mars quadrangles. Cheers! — Huntster (t @ c) 12:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * @Huntster - No problem whatsoever - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 12:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Code needs more work
Started to improve the source code - display of image and labels seems ok at the moment - but code could be better - an example of possibly needed effort is as follows:



CODE NOT OK =>

< span style="font:bold 09px Arial;display:inline;border:#151B8D 1px solid;background-color:#FFFF00;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[ [Mare Acidalium quadrangle|MC-04]]< /span> < span style="font:bold 08px Arial;display:inline;border:#151B8D 1px solid;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[ [Mare Acidalium quadrangle|Mare Acidalium]]< /span>< /div> CODE NOW BETTER =>

< span style="font:bold 09px Arial;display:inline;border:#151B8D 1px solid;background-color:#FFFF00;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[ [Mare Acidalium quadrangle|MC-04]]< /span>< /div>  < span style="font:bold 08px Arial;display:inline;border:#151B8D 1px solid;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[ [Mare Acidalium quadrangle|Mare Acidalium]]< /span>< /div>

In any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 21:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ - completed adding missing coding as described above - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Massive over-usage
This template is all over the place, when it shouldn't be. It's often been included under "External Links" on various Mars feature articles. That's clearly wrong. It does sit well in all the actual quad articles, and arguably in some of the higher level Mars articles, but even there it's badly included. I'm trying to salvage these instances now. Thoughts? Will purge imminently if no-one steps in to defend. Note I've also actually added the appropriate caption to the image, removing the spurious description of the fig in text it was repeatedly used with. DanHobley (talk) 17:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This should all be much cleaner and nicer now. Looked like mainly a formatting thing in most cases. Just been through to remove ambiguity. DanHobley (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)