Template talk:MonthsSource

Why are january 32. and march 0. linked to doomsday rule? demo 12:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know, and don't know why they where there to begin with. I suspect there might be a reason, but as no one's answered your comment from September, I've "boldly" removed the phantom dates.  If there is a reason for these dates, feel free to revert, and please put a note explain it on the main page here and the main page of, and let me know why all of the phantom dates redirect to "Doomsday rule". I'm curious! --jwandersTalk 09:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see a reason for the ones you removed, either, except February 30, which actually did occur a few times in various calendar reforms, so I added that one back. PaulGS (talk) 06:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I added the Doomsday redirects for one reason: They existed. As with the April Fools' redirect, I assumed there was a good reason and thought it would make the page more complete if we had links to days that may only exist in certain algorithms/calendars other than the modern Gregorian one.
 * I haven't really read too intently into the Doomsday rule page, just did a Special:Allpages/--- look for all pages/redirects of calender days, and checking to make sure they seemed legitimate.--Tim Thomason 00:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)