Template talk:More sources

First comment
I'm seeing this template placed in lots and lots of articles, particularly at the top. For example, Benjamin Franklin. I feel that this non-specific usage is not helpful. In this particular example, the article has a good number of refs, not at the FA level, certainly, but perhaps not enough to merit an obtrusive banner at the top of the article. I think some serious discussions need to happen about when such a template is appropriate, because if it was placed with the stringency seen at Benjamin Franklin, it would probably be needed at 75% of all wikipedia articles, and therefore not very useful. Thoughts? Debivort 09:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This could pretty much be used on every non-FA article on Wikipedia (and quite a few FA's, too). Unless the article is actively being worked on and a particular editor needs assistance in finding sources, it really shouldn't be used. But that's just my two cents. I think today is the first time I've ever seen this template. --- RockMFR 03:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Category:Articles lacking sources
I am probably going to be sorry I brought this up,(deep breath) ok, here goes. It would seem kind of pointless to use unreferenced for article with absolutely no references and More sources or Refimprove for those that are poorly sourced if they all place article in the same category. As it happens Refimprove puts articles into Category:Articles lacking reliable references, so perhaps Category:Articles lacking sources should be limited to unreferenced and everything else like primarysources should go to Category:Articles lacking reliable references.
 * Above is posted to Category_talk:Articles_lacking_sources please go there for central discussion. Jeepday (talk) 13:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This template under discussion
You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --After Midnight 0001 12:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Template clean up
Posted at TfD for clean up Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_16 result keep the merge more sources to refimprove Jeepday (talk) 03:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)