Template talk:MultiLicenseWithCC-BySA-Any

Adjusted version of template
At the moment this template uses a table markup that doesn't quite work (in IE6 at least) and looks like this:

I don't know whether it's poor markup at fault or IE's implementation of css etc, but in any case I didn't like the accidental-looking asymmetric pictures or the badly wrapped heading, so I've made this version for my user page, which also simplifies the markup:

User:Veledan/MultiLicenseWithCC-BySA-Any

If anyone with admin powers likes it better, please feel free to paste it into the main template! But please leave me a message if you do so I can re-link my page to the proper one :-)

~ Veledan • Talk + new 23:27, 30 August 2005 (UTC) Edited to avoid incorrect categorization of this page. DexDor(talk) 07:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

2.5
It states any version, but also links to 1.0 and 2.0. I think 2.5 should be mentioned in the same way. Cristan 15:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 3.0 was recently released as well. See DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-3.0 Paul C/T+ 05:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

SVG
Perhaps we could use The SVG image. Cristan 15:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

3.0
The template name contains the word "any", so shouldn't the template itself? Currently it just says 1.0 and 2.0. — Omegatron 01:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia licensing update
Please replace the text in this template with, per Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 11:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅ &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Strange template
This seems to be a strange template in that it says "I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under"... "the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license draft version 1.0 and version 2.0 and the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license version 2.0". Isn't that contradictory? The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license 2.0 and the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license version 2.0? don't seem compatible since one restricts use to non-commercial and the other doesn't. I would appreciate any help in understanding this issue. Adambro (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 26 July 2021
I request that this template be moved to Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in Category:Copyright user templates it should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 18:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌} see centralized discussion on this at Template_talk:TextLicenseFreeUse. — xaosflux  Talk 18:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 9 June 2023
Please change "draft version 1.0 and version 2.0 and the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license version 2.0." to "version 1.0 and 2.0, and the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license version 2.0." This prevents a MOS:SEAOFBLUE situation and makes it easier to read. Thanks! Frostly (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ hope that I did that write. You did omit the word "draft" possibly intentionally. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)