Template talk:No license

Usage: - this will do the right thing with Template:No license.


 * An archive of old, inactive discussion can be found at /archive1.

Template text: Unless the copyright status is provided...
For some reason I interpreted this phrase in the template as asking for the identity of the copyright holder. I would suggest it be changed to say something like "Unless a public domain or fair use claim is provided...", if that is what is intended. Gimmetrow 15:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Edit Request
Please edit the template so  is instead. --  tariq abjotu  02:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer to keep the current wording rather than have two exact dates, but if this charge is made, it must be +8, not +7. ×Meegs 03:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This wouldn't change ; it would instead change , which is currently incorrect because   (10-09-2006) is not the same as   (2006-09-10). I suppose I could change , but all that does is use the  template, as I suggested above (albeit incorrectly). --  tariq abjotu  09:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, right. I've made the change here and to No rationale. No source already had it. I used +7 since it's better that people think they have less time than they really do than more. Thanks. ×Meegs 17:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki
editprotected
 * Plz, add ru-wiki . Alex Spade 13:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done --ais523 14:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

editprotected

Please add ml:Template:No license to the interwiki links section. Thank you -Tux the penguin 09:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ Tra (Talk) 13:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)