Template talk:No ping

Protected edit request on 23 January 2014
Please either lower the protection level to TE or modify the template as follows: should be replaced with: As seen in the sandbox and displayed on the testcases page, also removing the highlighted line in the first snippit as that comment is no longer needed.

Technical 13 (talk) 17:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Template protection was lowered to and I made the change myself.  I'm not happy with the & separators, and do intend on replacing them with proper ,  including an and for the last one.  What would be great would be if someone like  could convert this to Lua (sorry to always pick on you, but I don't know anyone else that is as willing to convert stuff, perhaps this would make a good learning project for me with your guidance when I have a little time?) so that the limit of users to link without pinging wouldn't exist and proper comma separation would always be there?  Technical 13 (talk) 21:09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Consider it done: Module:No ping. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 13:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Pings being sent by noping
Noping currently appears to be broken. After [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Burninthruthesky/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=776950567 testing here], I got a notification saying, "your mention of Example user was sent". This follows the recent discussion at WT:Notifications. Burninthruthesky (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC) to reply to me 08:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC) to reply to me 08:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I reverted 's edit. I confirmed that the modification caused the template to ping users on testwiki. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Testing noping2, which I also modified: . I assume this is because generating a Lua title object causes the user to be pinged. Jc86035 (talk) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125;
 * I've reverted my edit on noping2 as well, since for some reason  also triggers a notification. Is this a bug or a feature? Jc86035 (talk) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125;

Requested move 5 October 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved (page mover nac) Flooded  with them hundreds  08:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC) -

– Add space into name to make the template name clearer, and conformity between names of similar templates (e.g. Ping group and Reply to. --  Alex TW 03:51, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Template:Noping → Template:No ping
 * Template:Noping2 → Template:No ping2
 * Support - see no reason why not. --Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Support Per nom.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 11:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination. --B dash (talk) 01:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Support. Currently sounds like it's to tell somebody "nope." Hyperbolick (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I hadn't thought of that, indeed the new title is more recognizable.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 21:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Noping which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Tooltip is missing
Not sure if that's something worth fixing, but figured I may as well point it out. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 05:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 30 July 2020
Please replace the following line (the very first line) at Module:No ping:

-- This module implements.

with this line:

-- This module implements.

This is simply to update/correct the name of the template being implemented. Jdaloner (talk) 09:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ * Pppery * it has begun... 14:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Adding appropriate use section
I recently came across an instance in which I thought this template was used inappropriately, and it occurs to me that the documentation here ought to offer some guidance on when it is/isn't appropriate to use this. Here's what I'd propose for that:

That wording doesn't establish any firm rules, but hopefully still gets across that is an idiot! isn't a great idea. Does that jive with others' understanding of best practice? I'll add it if so. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 19:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * ✅. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 20:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)