Template talk:Non-free film poster

Blue box
Why does using this template render the blue box, even after filling the "image has rationale" field with yes? The same isn't so for Template:Non-free movie poster. Kailash29792 (talk)  05:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Link to film poster
@JJMC89 Would you be able to update the Non-free poster to accept in a param so that the link could be modified, in this case to film poster, as that would serve better for this template? Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 04:49, 8 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Perhaps a named param like film poster? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 04:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Categorize?
Is it deliberately made to not categorize files using this template? By sampling Category:Fair use images of film posters, most files here are either using  (some without the rationale param) or   which shouldn't be the case. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The Category:Fair use images of film posters is rather very large category. Dispersing them into subcategories by language, country, genre would be useful. I think that's the rationale. If just  is used, with or without rationale, they are automatically categorized into the Category:Fair use images of film posters. So, I'd say, adding that in the non-free poster template is redundant and adding the category normally is also redundant as we have more fine-grained subcats — DaxServer (t · m · c) 07:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 24 November 2023
Description of suggested change: Change default to include category. Makes no sense to have a nil default value, param can be set to no when the poster is in a better category.

Diff: to --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * ❌ This request was previously contested above. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Just a question. Where can I get a consensus for this? --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 01:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Fair use images of film posters
It seems this isn't being automatically being added by the template, as it should? Is this due to the speedy renaming request, or some other reason? InfiniteNexus (talk) 08:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * See above. pinging for comment. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * When was this functionality removed? Please restore it, and start a discussion to propose its removal. The category has always been automatically added to Category:Non-free images of film posters until recently. This is explicitly noted at the top of the category page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this BOLD edit needs to be reverted ASAP. There is no point to manually add the category. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Pinging You wrote in the section above that the request was contested, but in actuality, it was a (fairly) recent BOLD change by the contesting editor that was done unilaterally and inappropriately. Since there is opposition, please revert their edit. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * It looks like that bold edit contained a syntax error that was preventing categorization from happening at all when that wasn't the author's intent, and neither DaxServer nor Minorax nor I noticed for 18 months (!). I've fixed the syntax error, which should mean categories start working properly. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I see the category is once again showing on film poster files. I was confused by DaxServer's reply to Minorax's question about why the category wasn't being added automatically; turns out it was a misunderstanding. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)