Template talk:Oiint

Spaces needed before and after the integral symbol
You say: this is handled but the CSS. Look at the examples, the integral symbol is completely squeezed, this does not look good. That why I had added spaces before and after the integral symbol. It doesn't seem to be handled at all. &mdash; TentaclesTalk or ✉ mailto: Tentacles 20:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, I added CSS to handle the spacing. &mdash; TentaclesTalk or ✉ mailto: Tentacles 20:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Please use the sandbox for testing first. There was an abundance of space in PNG rendering. It is slightly tight in MathML (Firefox), but not overly so to warrant so much space in PNG rendering. You have to take all rendering options into account.  20:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I thought it wasn't necessary to use a sandbox for a simple thing like adding a 4px margin with CSS. When I look at the examples on the doc page, the integrals are all squeezed (no space at all) in the PNG renderings in Firefox, in IE and in Chrome. How come you have an abundance of space in PNG rendering while I don't have any space? This makes it very hard to agree on anything if someone's improvement is somebody else's worsening... It begins to feel pointless to try to improve presentational code. &mdash; TentaclesTalk or ✉ mailto: Tentacles 20:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * In cases where multiple rendering is involved (math always), testing in the sandbox is always recommended. Turns out there is a simple solution after all, by using a regular space and let the browser handle it further. How's that?  20:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Wonderful! Perfect spacing in Firefox, in IE and in Chrome. Thanks. &mdash; TentaclesTalk or ✉ mailto: Tentacles 00:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

To get the LaTeX code we have to right click on three PNGs
Can we put a transparent rectangle covering the three PNGs so that we can right click to access all the LaTex at once? &mdash; TentaclesTalk or ✉ mailto: Tentacles 01:35, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

A dark mode variant of Oiint (and possibly every other closed integral template)?
So I noticed an issue while reading the article on Divergence theorem, when I switch to dark mode, the double integral disappears. I assume this is because the integral, colored in black, blended in with the black background. Is there any way to fix this? Milkymilsy (talk) 10:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Second this. Here's a screenshot of how the template documentation looks like in the dark mode:
 * Oiint dark mode.png
 * Everything except the integral sign itself is invisible. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 10:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)