Template talk:Orfud

Code Update
Could a templatey administrator change this    to this     at Template:Orfud? Thanks.  Set Sail For The Seven Seas   192° 28' 45" NET   12:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


 * ❌ at present. Has this been tested in a sandbox? Also, what does the change do? If it merely simplifies the code, my inclination is "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 21:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

A copy of this code can now be found in the sandbox and its effects can be seen at testcases. The template updates include the following changes: Thanks.  Set Sail For The Seven Seas   344° 18' 30" NET   22:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Updating the substitution check code to a more efficient version.
 * 2) Updating the date parameters to use existing date templates rather than variables, simplifying the code.
 * 3) Optimising the demo display on the Template:Orfud page to use Template:Tlp, simplifying the code.
 * 4) Removing the redundant page protection template, which is already included as part of the documentation.
 * 5) Moving categories to the documentation subpage.
 * re "Moving categories to the documentation subpage", you have forgotten to create the /doc page with the categories. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The documentation page has now been created and can be found here. Thanks.  Set Sail For The Seven Seas   204° 9' 15" NET   13:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 06:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 26 March 2016
Please redirect to Or-fu-re as per this TfD. Note that this will functionally change nothing for this template; the only difference between the two templates is that Or-fu-re accepts an optional replacement parameter. You will also need to template-protect Or-fu-re (and preferably Orfur, the other template considered at the TfD) since this is a high-visibility template. If I'm not mistaken, it's substituted by some fully-automated bots, which was the reason for the original template-protect on this template.

~ RobTalk 13:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could take a look at this one. ~ RobTalk 16:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * ✅ The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Would you mind also template-protecting the target as requested? This is highly-visible due to the frequent substitution by automated (or semi-automated) editing programs, and vandalism to Or-fu-re would likely be substituted onto a large number of pages before detected, with no easy way to fix them. ~ RobTalk 16:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I forgot to do that. Done now, though. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 2 November 2016
redirect to Template:Di-orphaned fair use to fix double redirect.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- John of Reading (talk) 22:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)