Template talk:POV assertion

Welcome
The picture doesn't shrink down so well, so if there is a higher-quality picture of the same, I'd go for it, also, if the picture changes on the other POV pages, it should change here too. The point of using a picture, versus something textual like Template:Dubious, or Template:POV-statement is so that it doesn't interrupt the reader. Some people read WP without editing, you know ;)

&mdash; &lt; T A L K JNDRLINE T A L K &gt;

Modify
I made the template more similar to Template:dubious. I prefer the new version I made, as having the scales image and then TALK in capital letters may confuse readers and they might not understand what the template is there for, this looks better and is more clear. Polonium 00:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Inline templates proposed
WikiProject Council/Proposals. I've been meaning to do this for a while. &mdash; SMcCandlish &#91;talk&#93; &#91;contrib&#93; ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

POV-statement
I'm not sure how the intent of this template is different from that of POV-statement. Perhaps this one could be clarified or deprecated? --AlastairIrvine (talk) 08:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I think these can probably be merged; I can't see much difference between them. they link to different categories, and have slightly different wording, but that's easy to resolve.  do you want to do the merge or do you want me to?  -- Ludwigs 2  13:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Already done; features have been combined, more specific categories used, and merged to the template with the better-developed documentation. —  SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 23:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)